Oil-based muds for reservoir drilling: Their performance and cleanup characteristics

被引:24
|
作者
Davison, JM
Jones, M
Shuchart, CE
Gerard, C
机构
[1] MI LLC, W Africa Mediterranean, Houston, TX USA
[2] ExxonMobil Upstream Res Co, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Flow-initiation pressures (FIPs) - Oil-based mud (OBM);
D O I
10.2118/72063-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the performance of a standard oil-based mud (OBM) to drill horizontal wellbores, concentrating on its formation-damage characteristics and the flow-initiation pressures (FIP's) required for production to flow through the filter cake. For heterogeneous reservoirs, damage is relatively low in low-permeability rocks, but the FIP is high. Conversely, for high-permeability rocks, the FIP is low but formation damage is relatively high. If the drawdown pressure available from the reservoir is low, the scenario exists where inflow will occur predominantly from the higher-permeability formations, which could be damaged badly, but little inflow will occur from relatively undamaged lower-permeability rocks. In terms of maximizing production, this is obviously a less-than-optimal scenario. Evaluations of cleanup fluids were conducted to gauge their effect on lowering the FIP of OEM filter cakes. Various fluids were screened for their mud-removal performance, which would indicate potentially good OEM "chemical breakers." Mud parameters such as oil:water (O:W) ratio, base-oil type, and emulsifier content all affected the efficiency of the cleanup fluids. The best cleanup fluids were used then in a series of core tests to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing the filter-cake FIP. Reductions between 25 and 40% were possible, although parameters such as soak time and overbalance pressure were critical to their success.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of oil-based drilling fluid on cement slurry performance and its mechanisms
    Li, Zaoyuan
    Gu, Tao
    Guo, Xiaoyang
    Kang, Suozhu
    Li, Ming
    Ou, Hongjuan
    Liu, Honghua
    Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35 (08) : 63 - 68
  • [42] Nanoplugging Performance of Hyperbranched Polyamine as Nanoplugging Agent in Oil-Based Drilling Fluid
    Xie, Gang
    Luo, Pingya
    Deng, Mingyi
    Wang, Zheng
    JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS, 2015, 2015
  • [43] Performance assessment of vegetable oil-based minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in drilling
    Khunt, C. P.
    Makhesana, M. A.
    Patel, K. M.
    Mawandiya, B. K.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 44 : 341 - 345
  • [44] Membrane efficiency of shales interacting with water-based and oil-based muds
    Bybee, Karen
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2007, 59 (11): : 79 - 80
  • [45] Analysis of the stability of oil-based drilling muds by electrical stability measurements as a function of oil-water ratio, weighting material and lubricant concentrations
    Borges, R. F. O.
    De Souza, R. S. V. A.
    Vargas, M. L. V.
    Scheid, C. M.
    Calcada, L. A.
    Meleiro, L. A. C.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 218
  • [46] Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Polymeric Phosphate Surfactants for Oil-Based Muds
    Ghiuba, F. M.
    Mahmoud, S. A.
    Dardir, M. M.
    JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1011 - 1018
  • [47] Invasion zone modeling using water- and oil-based muds
    I. N. El’tsov
    G. V. Nesterova
    A. A. Kashevarov
    Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2012, 53 : 552 - 558
  • [48] ELECTRICAL STABILITY, EMULSION STABILITY, AND WETTABILITY OF INVERT OIL-BASED MUDS
    GROWCOCK, FB
    ELLIS, CF
    SCHMIDT, DD
    SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION, 1994, 9 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [49] Flat-rheology oil-based drilling fluid for deepwater drilling
    Zhao X.
    Qiu Z.
    Xu J.
    Zhao C.
    Gao J.
    Qiu, Zhengsong (qiuzs63@sina.com), 1600, International Information and Engineering Technology Association (35): : 19 - 24
  • [50] Influence of final temperature on the distribution and characteristics of oil-based drilling cuttings pyrolysis products
    Shao Z.
    Ren W.
    Xu S.
    Nie F.
    Xu Y.
    Liu L.
    Xie S.
    Li X.
    Wang Q.
    Xie J.
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42 (09): : 4929 - 4938