Geographic Access to Radiation Therapy Facilities in the United States

被引:20
|
作者
Maroongroge, Sean [1 ]
Wallington, David G. [2 ]
Taylor, Paige A. [3 ]
Zhu, Diana [4 ]
Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh [1 ]
Smith, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Yu, James B. [5 ,6 ]
Ballas, Leslie K. [7 ]
机构
[1] UT MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Western Michigan Univ, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] UT MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Imaging & Radiat Oncol Core Houston QA Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Econ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Univ, Canc Outcomes Publ Policy & Effectiveness Res COP, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
TRAVEL DISTANCE; PROSTATE-CANCER; ASSOCIATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; BREAST; CARE; RADIOTHERAPY; MORTALITY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.144
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The current distribution of radiation therapy (RT) facilities in the United States is not well established. A comprehensive inventory of U.S. RT facilities was last assessed in 2005, based on data from state regulatory agencies and dosimetric quality assurance bodies. We updated this database to characterize population-level measures of geographic access to RT and analyze changes over the past 15 years. Methods and Materials: We compiled data from regulatory and accrediting organizations to identify U.S. facilities with linear accelerators used to treat humans in 2018 to 2020. Addresses were geocoded and analyzed with Geographic Information Services software. Geographic access was characterized by assessing the Euclidian distance between ZIP code tabulation areas/county centroids and RT facilities. Populations were assigned to each county to estimate the effect of facility changes at the population level. Logistic regressions were performed to identify features associated with increased distance to RT and associated with regions that gained an RT facility between the 2 time points studied. Results: In 2020, a total of 2313 U.S. RT facilities were reported, compared with 1987 in 2005, representing a 16.4% growth in facilities over nearly 15 years. Based on population attribution to the centroids of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, 77.9% of the U.S. population lives within 12.5 miles of an RT facility, and 1.8% of the U.S. population lives more than 50 miles from an RT facility. We found that increased distance to RT was associated with nonmetro status, less insurance, older median age, and less populated regions. Between 2005 and 2020, the population living within 12.5 miles from an RT facility increased by 2.1 percentage points, whereas the population living furthest from RT facilities decreased 0.6 percentage points. Regions with improved geographic RT access are more likely to be higher income and better insured. Conclusions: The percentage of the U.S. population with limited geographic access to RT is 1.8%. We found that people benefiting from improved access to RT facilities are more economically advantaged, suggesting disparities in geographic access may not improve without intervention. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 610
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Correctional Facilities of the United States
    Surya, Sandarsh
    McCall, W. Vaughn
    Iltis, Ana S.
    Rosenquist, Peter B.
    Hogan, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2015, 31 (03) : E34 - E34
  • [32] Geographic Accessibility of Radiation Therapy Facilities in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Nadella, Pranay
    Iyer, Hari S.
    Manirakiza, Achille
    Vanderpuye, Verna
    Triedman, Scott A.
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    Fadelu, Temidayo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (03): : 557 - 563
  • [33] Geographic Analysis of the United States Academic Radiation Oncology Workforce
    McClelland, S., III
    Huang, C.
    Holliday, E., Jr.
    Jagsi, R.
    Zellars, R. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S122 - S123
  • [34] AN OVERVIEW OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITIES OUTSIDE THE UNITED-STATES
    WINICK, H
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1984, 222 (1-2): : 5 - 5
  • [35] A survey of veterinary radiation facilities in the United States during 2001
    McEntee, MC
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2004, 45 (05) : 476 - 479
  • [36] Geographic Proximity to Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Facilities Across the United States
    Sayed, Ahmed
    Al-Mallah, Mouaz
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 17 (12) : 1513 - 1515
  • [37] Optimal Location of Radiation Therapy Centers With Respect to Geographic Access
    Santibanez, Pablo
    Gaudet, Marc
    French, John
    Liu, Emma
    Tyldesley, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 89 (04): : 745 - 755
  • [38] Sociodemographic and Geographic Variation in Access to Neuro-Ophthalmologists in the United States
    Xue, Katie
    Feng, Yilin
    Tam, Vicky
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    De Lott, Lindsey B. B.
    Hamedani, Ali G. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 43 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [39] Geographic Access to Gynecologic Cancer Care in the United States EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Shalowitz, David I.
    Vinograd, Alexandra M.
    Giuntoli, Robert L.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (12) : 754 - 755
  • [40] Geographic Visualization of Mortality in the United States as Related to Healthcare Access by County
    Widrich, Jason
    Nation, Shelley
    Chippada, Prithvi
    Wiener, Eric
    Jenkins, Eldon
    Peters, Landan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (01)