A comparison of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo in the detection of multiple sclerosis

被引:12
|
作者
Patola, WB [1 ]
Coulter, BA [1 ]
Chipperfield, PM [1 ]
Lingawi, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
multiple sclerosis; spin-echo imaging; fast spin-echo imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; brain;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1093
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Fast spin-echo (PSE) pulse sequences enable T2-weighted imaging in a fraction of the time required for T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (CSE) imaging. Due to concerns that the altered contrast characteristics of FSE may interfere with the visualization of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, the sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences was compared to comparably weighted CSE sequences in the imaging of the brain in 100 patients with clinically suspected MS. The proton-density FSE sequence revealed more MS lesions than Its CSE counterpart, while the T2-weighted CSE sequences were found to be more sensitive than the T2-weighted FSE sequence. Contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios compared favorably between sequences. Overall, there was little difference in the specificity between FSE and CSE in the diagnosis of MS. The higher sensitivity and the reduction in time attainable through the use of FSE warrants its replacement of CSE when imaging the brain In patients with clinically suspected MS. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 667
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON BETWEEN FAST SPIN-ECHO AND CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO IMAGING OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL MUSCULOSKELETAL STRUCTURES IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG-ADULTS
    JARAMILLO, D
    LAOR, T
    MULKERN, RV
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 (09) : 803 - 811
  • [32] Comparison of fast spin-echo imaging with tailored RF pulses versus conventional spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears
    Ma, LD
    McFarland, EG
    Bluemke, DA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1488 - 1488
  • [33] Comparison of inversion-recovery gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques in the detection and characterization of liver lesions
    Pijl, MEJ
    Wasser, MNJM
    van Meerten, ELV
    Gratama, JWC
    van de Velde, CJH
    Hermans, J
    Elevelt, A
    Bloem, JL
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) : 427 - 434
  • [34] Usefulness of turbo spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: Comparison with a conventional spin-echo sequence
    Escobedo, EM
    Hunter, JC
    ZinkBrody, GC
    Wilson, AJ
    Harrison, SD
    Fisher, DJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (05) : 1223 - 1227
  • [35] MULTIPLE SPIN-ECHO FORMATION
    GOLUB, VO
    KOTOV, VV
    POGORELY, AN
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1991, 69 (08) : 6231 - 6231
  • [36] FAST SPIN-ECHO IMAGING OF THE NECK - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO, UTILITY OF FAT-SUPPRESSION, AND EVALUATION OF TISSUE CONTRAST CHARACTERISTICS
    LEWIN, JS
    CURTIN, HD
    ROSS, JS
    WEISSMAN, JL
    OBUCHOWSKI, NA
    TKACH, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1994, 15 (07) : 1351 - 1357
  • [37] Comparison of fat-saturation fast spin echo versus conventional spin-echo MRI in the detection of rotator cuff pathology
    Needell, SD
    Zlatkin, MB
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (04): : 674 - 677
  • [38] NIR DIAGNOSIS OF MENISCAL TEARS OF THE KNEE - VALUE OF FAST SPIN-ECHO VS CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO PULSE SEQUENCES
    RUBIN, DA
    KNEELAND, JB
    LISTERUD, J
    UNDERBERGDAVIS, SJ
    DALINKA, MK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (05) : 1131 - 1135
  • [39] Sagittal MR of multiple sclerosis in the spinal cord: Fast versus conventional spin-echo imaging
    Nijeholt, GJLA
    Castelijns, JA
    Weerts, J
    Ader, H
    van Waesberghe, JHTM
    Polman, C
    Barkhof, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1998, 19 (02) : 355 - 360
  • [40] T2-weighted MR imaging of the uterus: Comparison of optimized fast spin-echo and HASTE sequences with conventional fast spin-echo sequences
    Gryspeerdt, S
    Van Hoe, L
    Bosmans, H
    Baert, AL
    Vergote, I
    Marchal, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 211 - 215