Applying kriging proxies for Markov chain Monte Carlo in reservoir simulation

被引:6
|
作者
Fursov, Ilya [1 ]
Christie, Mike [1 ]
Lord, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Markov chain Monte Carlo; Uncertainty quantification; Gaussian process; Proxy model; Reservoir simulation; SEQUENTIAL DESIGN; COMPUTER; UNCERTAINTY; EMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-020-09968-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One way to quantify the uncertainty in Bayesian inverse problems arising in the engineering domain is to generate samples from the posterior distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. The basic MCMC methods tend to explore the parameter space slowly, which makes them inefficient for practical problems. On the other hand, enhanced MCMC approaches, like Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), require the gradients from the physical problem simulator, which are often not available. In this case, a feasible option is to use the gradient approximations provided by the surrogate (proxy) models built on the simulator output. In this paper, we consider proxy-aided HMC employing the Gaussian process (kriging) emulator. We overview in detail the different aspects of kriging proxies, the underlying principles of the HMC sampler and its interaction with the proxy model. The proxy-aided HMC algorithm is thoroughly tested in different settings, and applied to three case studies-one toy problem, and two synthetic reservoir simulation models. We address the question of how the sampler performance is affected by the increase of the problem dimension, the use of the gradients in proxy training, the use of proxy-for-the-data and the different approaches to the design points selection. It turns out that applying the proxy model with HMC sampler may be beneficial for relatively small physical models, with around 20 unknown parameters. Such a sampler is shown to outperform both the basic Random Walk Metropolis algorithm, and the HMC algorithm fed by the exact simulator gradients.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1746
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STEREOGRAPHIC MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO
    Yang, Jun
    Latuszynski, Krzysztof
    Roberts, Gareth o.
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2024, 52 (06): : 2692 - 2713
  • [32] Survey of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods in Light Transport Simulation
    Sik, Martin
    Krivanek, Jaroslav
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2020, 26 (04) : 1821 - 1840
  • [33] Comparison of Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithms in subset simulation
    Lan C.
    Xu Z.
    Ma J.
    Zhao X.
    Li H.
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55 (10): : 33 - 45and79
  • [34] A simulation approach to convergence rates for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms
    MARY KATHRYN COWLES
    JEFFREY S. ROSENTHAL
    Statistics and Computing, 1998, 8 : 115 - 124
  • [35] Back analysis of slope failure with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation
    Zhang, L. L.
    Zhang, J.
    Zhang, L. M.
    Tang, W. H.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2010, 37 (7-8) : 905 - 912
  • [36] Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods for Structural Reliability Analysis
    Proppe, Carsten
    X INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (EURODYN 2017), 2017, 199 : 1122 - 1127
  • [37] A simulation approach to convergence rates for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms
    Cowles, MK
    Rosenthal, JS
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 1998, 8 (02) : 115 - 124
  • [38] SORM, Design Points, Subset Simulation, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Breitung, Karl
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [39] An Aspect Oriented Framework to Applying Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods with Dynamic Models
    Bhowmik, Priyasree
    Dutchyn, Christopher
    Osgood, Nathaniel
    2016 SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF MODELING AND SIMULATION (TMS-DEVS), 2016,
  • [40] USING PARALLEL MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO TO QUANTIFY UNCERTAINTIES IN GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR CALIBRATION
    Cui, T.
    Fox, C.
    Nicholls, G. K.
    O'Sullivan, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2019, 9 (03) : 295 - 310