Analytical Study of the Seismic Performance of Steel-Braced Frames with Masonry Infill

被引:2
|
作者
Jazany, Roohollah Ahmady [1 ]
Hajirasouliha, Iman [2 ]
Moghadam, Abdolreza S. [1 ]
Kayhani, Hossein [3 ]
Farshchi, Hamidreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Earthquake Engn & Seismol, Struct Engn Res Ctr, Tehran 193953913, Iran
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Sheffield S10 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Pardis Branch, Tehran 16555135, Iran
关键词
Concentrically braced frames; Masonry infill; Gusset plate; Fracture; Equivalent plastic strain; Metal and composite structures; CONNECTIONS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001548
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Special concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are widely used as efficient lateral-load resisting systems in seismic regions. In this study, experimentally validated finite-element (FE) models are used to investigate the effects of masonry infill and gusset-plate configuration on the seismic performance of CBFs. It is shown that the presence of masonry infill can increase the initial stiffness and ultimate strength of CBFs by up to 35 and 52%, respectively. However, the frame-infill interaction imposes high plastic strain demands at the horizontal re-entrant corner of gusset plate connections, which may lead to premature failure of fillet welds under strong earthquakes. Whereas using tapered gusset plates can significantly increase the fracture potential at fillet welds, gusset plates with elliptical clearance of eight times the plate thickness can lead to up to 54% lower equivalent plastic strain demands at both gusset plate connections and brace elements. Although the effects of masonry infill are usually ignored in the seismic design process, the results highlight the importance of considering those effects in the seismic design of CBF elements and gusset plate connections.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study on Seismic Behavior of Different Forms of Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames
    Liu, Bo
    Lu, Yankai
    Li, Weitao
    Li, Jiayue
    Zhao, Jingchen
    Wang, Shuhe
    Ni, Guowei
    Meng, Qingjuan
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [42] Pushover analysis of masonry infilled steel frames with seismic infill wall isolator subframe (SIWIS) system
    Memari, AM
    Aliaari, M
    EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT ENGINEERING STRUCTURES IV, 2003, 13 : 191 - 202
  • [43] Seismic behavior of soft storey mid-rise steel frames with randomly distributed masonry infill
    Quayyum, Shahriar
    Alam, M. Shahria
    Rteil, Ahmad
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2013, 14 (06): : 523 - 545
  • [44] Seismic design for enhanced building performance using rocking steel braced frames
    Pollino, Michael
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 83 : 129 - 139
  • [45] Seismic Performance of Buckling Restrained Braced Steel Frames Considering BRB Connection
    Jia, Mingming
    Liu, Kai
    Hong, Cheng
    Brwa, Ahmed Saed
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 455
  • [46] Evaluation of the seismic performance of suspended zipper column concentrically braced steel frames
    Wijesundara, K. K.
    Nascimbene, R.
    Rassati, Gian A.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2018, 150 : 452 - 461
  • [47] Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity
    Tremblay, R
    Poncet, L
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (09) : 1363 - 1375
  • [48] A comparative performance-based seismic assessment of strongback steel braced frames
    Faramarzi, Mohammadreza Salek
    Taghikhany, Touraj
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44
  • [49] Seismic performance evaluation of braced steel frames designed according to the Egyptian code
    Abou-Elfath, Hamdy
    Mashaly, Mohamed
    AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2010, 49 (03): : 257 - 267
  • [50] Seismic performance of steel chevron braced frames designed according to Japanese practice
    Seki, Akiri
    Inoue, Keisuke
    Okazaki, Taichiro
    Hashioka, Shogo
    Asada, Hayato
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 189