Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence

被引:14
|
作者
Ayorinde, Abimbola A. [1 ]
Williams, Iestyn [2 ]
Mannion, Russell [2 ]
Song, Fujian [3 ]
Skrybant, Magdalena [4 ]
Lilford, Richard J. [4 ]
Chen, Yen-Fu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Hlth Sci, Warwick Ctr Appl Hlth Res & Delivery, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Social Policy, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Publication bias; Outcome reporting bias; Dissemination bias; Grey literature; Research publication; Research registration; Health services research; Systematic review; Research methodology; Funnel plots; IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; P-CURVE; QUALITY; INFORMATICS; STRATEGIES; COUNTRIES; COVERAGE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-020-01010-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Publication and related biases (including publication bias, time-lag bias, outcome reporting bias and p-hacking) have been well documented in clinical research, but relatively little is known about their presence and extent in health services research (HSR). This paper aims to systematically review evidence concerning publication and related bias in quantitative HSR. Methods Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC, CINAHL, Web of Science, Health Systems Evidence, Cochrane EPOC Review Group and several websites were searched to July 2018. Information was obtained from: (1) Methodological studies that set out to investigate publication and related biases in HSR; (2) Systematic reviews of HSR topics which examined such biases as part of the review process. Relevant information was extracted from included studies by one reviewer and checked by another. Studies were appraised according to commonly accepted scientific principles due to lack of suitable checklists. Data were synthesised narratively. Results After screening 6155 citations, four methodological studies investigating publication bias in HSR and 184 systematic reviews of HSR topics (including three comparing published with unpublished evidence) were examined. Evidence suggestive of publication bias was reported in some of the methodological studies, but evidence presented was very weak, limited in both quality and scope. Reliable data on outcome reporting bias and p-hacking were scant. HSR systematic reviews in which published literature was compared with unpublished evidence found significant differences in the estimated intervention effects or association in some but not all cases. Conclusions Methodological research on publication and related biases in HSR is sparse. Evidence from available literature suggests that such biases may exist in HSR but their scale and impact are difficult to estimate for various reasons discussed in this paper. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2016 CRD42016052333.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Worker-related ageism: a systematic review of empirical research
    Jacob Cebola, Maria Manuela
    dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo
    Dionisio, Andreia
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2023, 43 (08) : 1882 - 1914
  • [12] Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments
    Stepurko, Tetiana
    Pavlova, Milena
    Gryga, Irena
    Groot, Wim
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
  • [13] Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments
    Tetiana Stepurko
    Milena Pavlova
    Irena Gryga
    Wim Groot
    BMC Health Services Research, 10
  • [14] Methods in Public Health Services and Systems Research A Systematic Review
    Harris, Jenine K.
    Beatty, Kate E.
    Barbero, Colleen
    Howard, Alex F.
    Cheskin, Robin A.
    Shapiro, Robert M., II
    Mays, Glen P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (05) : S42 - S57
  • [15] Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review
    Page, Matthew J.
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Egger, Matthias
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2021, 12 (02) : 248 - 259
  • [16] Is there evidence that friends influence body weight? A systematic review of empirical research
    Cunningham, Solveig A.
    Vaquera, Elizabeth
    Maturo, Claire C.
    Narayan, K. M. Venkat
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (07) : 1175 - 1183
  • [17] How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011
    Kiil, Astrid
    Houlberg, Kurt
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2014, 15 (08): : 813 - 828
  • [18] How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011
    Astrid Kiil
    Kurt Houlberg
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2014, 15 : 813 - 828
  • [19] Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
    Page, Matthew J.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Clayton, Gemma
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Savovic, Jelena
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [20] Mapping SME productivity research: a systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda
    Owalla, Beldina
    Gherhes, Cristian
    Vorley, Tim
    Brooks, Chay
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2022, 58 (03) : 1285 - 1307