Ef ficiency assessment of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities by a slacked -based DEA model

被引:54
|
作者
Cheng, Panpan [1 ]
Jin, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Hui [1 ]
Hua, Ming [3 ]
Ye, Zhen [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Res, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency assessment; Rural domestic sewage; Potential improvement; Sensitivity analysis; Explanatory factors; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; TREATMENT PLANTS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; WWTPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122111
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the context of sustainable development, a number of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities had been built in China to solve the problem of rural domestic sewage pollution. The comprehensive, quantitative and objective efficiency assessment of facilities is urgent. This study used a non-radial slacked-based data envelopment analysis model combined with cluster analysis to construct an index system covering multiple aspects, including three inputs and four outputs to assess 681 facilities. These samples selected from the biggest demonstration area are the most representative for and exceed 2/5 of the running facilities all over the country. The average efficiency score of samples was 0.496 meaning the improvement potential was about 50.4%. Only 27 samples were relatively effective, scoring 1. The remaining 654 facilities had different levels of input excesses or output shortfalls, which should be the key objects to improve overall performance. In addition, there was evidence that output indicators had more room for improvement than input indicators. The analysis of sensitivity on inputs and outputs confirmed that the idleness and poor treatment effects of rural sewage treatment facilities should be concerned. Finally, Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test verified that technology and load rate of facilities have significant impacts on efficiency. The performance evaluation results could not only provide guidance for the local government to strengthen the supervision and operation of facilities, but also potentially provide reference for the construction, operation and management of rural sewage treatment facilities in China.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on comprehensive evaluation model of rural domestic sewage treatment technology based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and analytic hierarchy process method
    Zhang Qi-yu
    Liu Zeng-jin
    Liu Lai-sheng
    Li Na
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 16 (02): : 452 - 471
  • [32] Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage Anaerobic Filter Reactor Effluent by Constructed Wetland at Different Sewage Temperature
    Ladu, John Leju Celestino
    Lu, Xi-Wu
    Ping, Zhong-Zhao
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT, MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, (EMIED 2015), 2015, : 145 - 149
  • [33] Optimization of rural domestic sewage treatment mode based on life cycle assessment method: A case study of Wuzhong District, Suzhou City, China
    Wang, Peng
    Shi, Jingyi
    Xiong, Ping
    Chen, Meidan
    Jin, Wenlong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 56
  • [34] IMPACT OF RURAL DOMESTIC GARBAGE AND SEWAGE TREATMENT ON THE ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT IN QINGDAO, CHINA
    Wang, Yesong
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (02): : 1434 - 1440
  • [35] Design of modular constructed wetland and its effect on rural domestic sewage treatment
    Cong Changsong
    Wang Mingsen
    Jin Li
    Tian Ye
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY ENVIRONMENT AND GREEN DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 657
  • [36] Study on the evaluation method of operation performance for rural domestic wastewater treatment facilities
    Huang Jin
    Wang Junan
    Zhao Xuelian
    Zhang Xiaoxin
    Wei Weili
    [J]. 2020 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND DEVELOPMENT (IWRED 2020), 2020, 510
  • [37] Comparison of Carbon Emissions from Traditional Treatment and Source Separation Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage
    Cao, Rui
    Feng, Li
    Du, Zi-Wen
    Zhang, Li-Qiu
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (08): : 4648 - 4655
  • [38] Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment Technology Application in Conghua District of Guangzhou under the Rural Revitalization Strategy
    Li, Xiuyun
    [J]. 2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 621
  • [39] Waste assessment decision support systems used for domestic sewage treatment
    Dacewicz, Ewa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2019, 31
  • [40] Study of the characteristics of pollutants in rural domestic sewage and the optimal sewage treatment process: a Chengdu Plain case study
    Chen, Xuefeng
    Chao, Liqiang
    Wan, Yanlei
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    Pu, Xunchi
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 87 (09) : 2373 - 2389