Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing?

被引:8
|
作者
Williams, Z. F. [1 ]
Tenzel, P. [1 ]
Hooks, W. I. I. I. I. I. I. [1 ]
Hope, W. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Hanover Reg Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 2131 South 17th St,POB 9025, Wilmington, NC 28401 USA
关键词
Laparotomy; Closure; Suture; Wound; Length; Ratio; MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY INCISIONS; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HERNIA; PREVENTION; STITCH; BITES;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-017-1667-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Research has established that a >= 4:1 suture to wound (S:W) length ratio decreases incisional hernias. We evaluated our ability to obtain a 4:1 S:W length ratio in a surgery residency program. Methods Consecutive abdominal wall closures from 12/1/2013 through 4/9/2015 were reviewed. The length of the incisions and amount of suture used were measured. Patient demographics and operative variables were documented and compared related to inability to obtain a 4:1 ratio. Results One hundred patients underwent abdominal closure with S:W length measurements. Average wound length was 18.3 cm; average suture length used was 84.5 cm; and average S:W length ratio was 4.6:1. An S:W length ratio of >= 4:1 was achieved in 76% of cases. There was no difference in race, age, gender, BMI, type of procedure, or resident level in obtaining a 4:1 S:W length ratio. There was a significantly higher rate of not achieving a 4:1 ratio when two residents closed. Postoperative infection rate and hernia rate increased when a 4:1 S:W length ratio was not achieved compared with an adequate S:W length ratio. Conclusions Despite the known importance of achieving a 4:1 S:W length ratio for abdominal closure, it was only achieved in 76% of study patients. Improved education on the importance of fascial closure is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 872
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypertension control - How well are we doing?
    Borzecki, AM
    Wong, AT
    Hickey, EC
    Ash, AS
    Berlowitz, DR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (22) : 2705 - 2711
  • [22] EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY - HOW WELL ARE WE DOING
    EBERT, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 66 (02): : 191 - 192
  • [23] Beyond ADHD: How Well Are We Doing?
    Stein, Ruth E. K.
    Storfer-Isser, Amy
    Kerker, Bonnie D.
    Garner, Andrew
    Szilagyi, Moira
    Hoagwood, Kimberly E.
    O'Connor, Karen G.
    Horwitz, Sarah McCue
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2016, 16 (02) : 115 - 121
  • [24] MILLING ALUMINUM - HOW WELL ARE WE DOING
    ALBERT, M
    [J]. MODERN MACHINE SHOP, 1983, 56 (05) : 56 - 63
  • [25] ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE - A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLYAMIDE AND POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE (PDS)
    BERRY, AR
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1986, 68 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [26] SUTURE LENGTH TO WOUND LENGTH RATIO AND THE INTEGRITY OF MIDLINE AND LATERAL PARAMEDIAN INCISIONS
    KENDALL, SWH
    BRENNAN, TG
    GUILLOU, PJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (06) : 705 - 707
  • [27] Research: Do we know how well we are doing?
    Thomas, Yvonne
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2007, 54 (02) : 87 - 87
  • [28] PAIN MANAGEMENT - HOW WELL ARE WE DOING AND HOW DO WE KNOW
    WARFIELD, CA
    [J]. PAIN FORUM, 1995, 4 (01): : 63 - 65
  • [29] In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Mesh Suture Design for Abdominal Wall Closure
    Souza, Jason M.
    Dumanian, Zari P.
    Gurjala, Anandev N.
    Dumanian, Gregory A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (02) : 322E - 330E
  • [30] A rare cause of unclosed abdominal wall wound: Swallowed suture needles
    Karakol, Percin
    Tatar, Burak Ergun
    Uslu, Can
    Sezgic, Melihcan
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (03) : 185 - 187