Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing?

被引:8
|
作者
Williams, Z. F. [1 ]
Tenzel, P. [1 ]
Hooks, W. I. I. I. I. I. I. [1 ]
Hope, W. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Hanover Reg Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 2131 South 17th St,POB 9025, Wilmington, NC 28401 USA
关键词
Laparotomy; Closure; Suture; Wound; Length; Ratio; MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY INCISIONS; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HERNIA; PREVENTION; STITCH; BITES;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-017-1667-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Research has established that a >= 4:1 suture to wound (S:W) length ratio decreases incisional hernias. We evaluated our ability to obtain a 4:1 S:W length ratio in a surgery residency program. Methods Consecutive abdominal wall closures from 12/1/2013 through 4/9/2015 were reviewed. The length of the incisions and amount of suture used were measured. Patient demographics and operative variables were documented and compared related to inability to obtain a 4:1 ratio. Results One hundred patients underwent abdominal closure with S:W length measurements. Average wound length was 18.3 cm; average suture length used was 84.5 cm; and average S:W length ratio was 4.6:1. An S:W length ratio of >= 4:1 was achieved in 76% of cases. There was no difference in race, age, gender, BMI, type of procedure, or resident level in obtaining a 4:1 S:W length ratio. There was a significantly higher rate of not achieving a 4:1 ratio when two residents closed. Postoperative infection rate and hernia rate increased when a 4:1 S:W length ratio was not achieved compared with an adequate S:W length ratio. Conclusions Despite the known importance of achieving a 4:1 S:W length ratio for abdominal closure, it was only achieved in 76% of study patients. Improved education on the importance of fascial closure is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 872
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing?
    Z. F. Williams
    P. Tenzel
    W. B. Hooks
    W. W. Hope
    [J]. Hernia, 2017, 21 : 869 - 872
  • [2] Six-fold suture: wound length ratio for abdominal closure
    Rampaul, RS
    Naraynsingh, V
    Maharaj, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (02) : 148 - 148
  • [3] Six-fold suture:wound length ratio for abdominal closure
    Varshney, S
    Manek, P
    Johnson, CD
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1999, 81 (05) : 333 - 336
  • [4] The effects of different suture techniques on wound healing in abdominal wall closure
    S¸ahin, M.
    Karademir, M.
    Özer, S.
    Avs¸ar, F.M.
    Çaglayan, O.
    Aksoy, F.
    Aktan, M.
    [J]. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 2001, 31 (05) : 391 - 394
  • [5] ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE - CHOICE OF SUTURE
    MILLS, WG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1981, 74 (12) : 946 - 946
  • [6] ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE - CHOICE OF SUTURE
    BUCKNALL, TE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1981, 74 (08) : 580 - 585
  • [7] Suture length to wound length ratio in 175 small animal abdominal midline closures
    Winter, Verena
    Degasperi, Brigitte
    Bockstahler, Barbara
    Dupre, Gilles
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [8] ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE WITHOUT PERITONEAL SUTURE
    KAPUR, BML
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 75 (FEB) : 281 - 286
  • [9] BURYING SUTURE KNOTS IN ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE
    DAVID, TE
    HERMANN, RE
    [J]. SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1976, 142 (03): : 408 - 409
  • [10] RUNNING SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE SUTURE IN ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE
    SLOOP, RD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 141 (05): : 572 - 573