Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

被引:8
|
作者
Schulz-Wendtland, R. [1 ]
Dilbat, G. [2 ]
Bani, M. [3 ]
Fasching, P. A. [3 ]
Lux, M. P. [3 ]
Wenkel, E. [1 ]
Schwab, S. [4 ]
Loehberg, C. R. [3 ]
Jud, S. M. [3 ]
Rauh, C. [3 ]
Bayer, C. M. [3 ]
Beckmann, M. W. [5 ]
Uder, M. [4 ]
Meier-Meitinger, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikums Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Radiol Roth, Radiol, Roth, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Univ Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Inst Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
breast; mammographic density; mammography; breast cancer; PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS; SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY; CANCER RISK; THERAPY; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; MAGNIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; EXCISION; MORTALITY; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1314942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess whether it would be possible to reduce the rate of re-excisions and improve the quality using CMOS technology or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared to a conventional FFDM system. Material and Methods: An invasive breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) was diagnosed in 200 patients in the period from 5/2011 to 1/2012. After histological verification, a breast-conserving therapy was performed with intraoperative imaging. Three different imaging systems were used: 1) Inspiration (TM) (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm as the standard; 2) BioVision (TM) (Bioptics, Tucson, USA), flat panel photodiode array, tungsten source, focus 0.05, resolution 50 mu m pixel pitch, 12 l/mm; 3) Tomosynthesis (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm, range: 50 degrees, 25 projections, scan time > 20 s, geometry: uniform scanning, reconstruction: filtered back projection. The 600 radiograms were prospectively shown to 3 radiologists. Results: Out of a total of 200 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) 156 patients required no further operative therapy (re-excision) after breast-conserving therapy. A retrospective analysis (n = 44) showed an increase in sensitivity with tomosynthesis compared to the BioVision (TM) (CMOS technology) and the Inspiration (TM) at a magnification of 1.0 : 1.0 of 8% (p < 0.05), i.e. re-excision would not have been necessary in 16 patients with tomosynthesis. Conclusions: The sensitivity of tomosynthesis for intraoperative radiography is significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both CMOS technology and an FFDM system with a conventional detector. Additional studies using higher magnification, e.g. 2.0 : 1.0, but no zooming will be necessary to evaluate the method further.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital full-field mammography (FFDM) versus digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) Which system increases the quality of preparation radiography?
    Urban, H.
    Bauerschmitz, G. J.
    Gallwas, J.
    Wienbeck, S.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 82 (10) : E175 - E175
  • [2] Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Dilbat, G.
    Bani, M.
    Fasching, P. A.
    Heusinger, K.
    Lux, M. P.
    Loehberg, C. R.
    Brehm, B.
    Hammon, M.
    Saake, M.
    Dankerl, P.
    Jud, S. M.
    Rauh, C.
    Bayer, C. M.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Uder, M.
    Meier-Meitinger, M.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2013, 73 (05) : 422 - 427
  • [3] Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
    MA
    02115, United States
    Clin. Imaging, 2024,
  • [4] Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Majid, Sana Z.
    Senapati, Gunjan M.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 107
  • [5] Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)
    Bertolini, Marco
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Borasi, Giovanni
    Botti, Andrea
    Tassoni, Davide
    Sghedoni, Roberto
    Zuccoli, Giulio
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2011, 24 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [6] Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)
    Marco Bertolini
    Andrea Nitrosi
    Giovanni Borasi
    Andrea Botti
    Davide Tassoni
    Roberto Sghedoni
    Giulio Zuccoli
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2011, 24 : 58 - 65
  • [7] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography (FFDM) in younger symptomatic women
    Whelehan, Patsy
    Ali, Kulsam
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Ball, Graham
    Cox, Julie
    Farry, Paul
    Jenkin, Maggie
    Kapsoulis, Dimitrios
    Lowry, Keith
    McIntosh, Stuart
    Nutt, Rachel
    Oeppen, Rachel
    Reilly, Michael
    Stahnke, Michaela
    Steel, Jim
    Sim, Yee Ting
    Warwick, Violet
    Wilkinson, Louise
    Evans, Andrew
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [8] Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
    Choi, Yoonmi
    Woo, Ok-hee
    Shin, Hye-sun
    Cho, Kyu Ran
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    Choi, Ga-Young
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 12 - 17
  • [9] Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) procedures in Morocco
    Talbi, Mohammed
    El Mansouri, M'hamed
    Nhila, Oussama
    Tahiri, Zakaria
    Eddaoui, Khalida
    Khalis, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2022, 53 (02) : 242 - 247
  • [10] Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study
    Asbeutah, Akram M.
    AlMajran, Abdullah A.
    Brindhaban, Ajit
    Asbeutah, Saad A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 67 (03) : 185 - 192