共 50 条
Comparative evaluation of three commercial systems for nucleic acid extraction from urine specimens
被引:56
|作者:
Tang, YW
Sefers, SE
Li, HJ
Kohn, DJ
Procop, GW
机构:
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Clin Microbiol Sect, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1128/JCM.43.9.4830-4833.2005
中图分类号:
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号:
071005 ;
100705 ;
摘要:
A nucleic acid extraction system that can handle small numbers of specimens with a short test turnaround time and short hands-on time is desirable for emergent testing. We performed a comparative validation on three systems: the MagNA Pure compact system (Compact), the NucliSens miniMAG extraction instrument (miniMAG), and the BioRobot EZ1 system (EZ1). A total of 75 urine specimens submitted for polyomavirus BK virus detection were used. The human beta-actin gene was detected on 75 (100%), 75 (100%), and 72 (96%) nucleic acid extracts prepared by the miniMAG, EZ1, and Compact, respectively. The miniMAG produced the highest quantity of nucleic acids and the best precision among the three systems. The agreement rate was 100% for BKV detection on nucleic acid extracts prepared by the three extraction systems. When a full panel of specimens was run, the hands-on time and test turnaround time were 105.7 and 121.1 min for miniMAG, 6.1 and 22.6 min for EZ1, and 7.4 and 33.7 min for Compact, respectively. The EZ1 and Compact systems processed automatic nucleic acid extraction properly, providing a good solution to the need for sporadic but emergent specimen detection. The miniMAG yielded the highest quantity of nucleic acids, suggesting that this system would be the best for specimens containing a low number of microorganisms of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:4830 / 4833
页数:4
相关论文