Residual hearing preservation using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation

被引:4
|
作者
Arnoldner, Christoph [1 ]
Gstoettner, Wolfgang [1 ]
Riss, Dominik [1 ]
Wagenblast, Jens [2 ]
Honeder, Clemens [1 ]
Blineder, Michaela [1 ]
Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan [1 ]
Jappel, Alexandra [1 ]
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, A-1097 Vienna, Austria
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Cochlear implant; hearing preservation; electric-acoustic stimulation; hybrid; surgery; ELECTRODE INSERTION; MASTOIDECTOMY; COCHLEOSTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00508-011-0043-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Cochlear implantation of patients with high-frequency hearing loss and residual low-frequency hearing has become a new treatment standard within the last years. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric-acoustic stimulation using the suprameatal approach. Methods: Five patients (mean age 48.2 years) who were supplied with Med El (Combi 40+, Pulsar) cochlear implants and various different electrodes (Custom made, Flex soft, Flex EAS) were evaluated for residual hearing preservation after a mean follow-up time of 35.6 months (range 24 to 77 months). Results: Three patients showed partial hearing preservation, whereas 2 patients experienced a complete loss of residual hearing. Conclusion: Although hearing preservation rates in this series of patients operated on using the suprameatal approach were inferior as compared with a series using the standard mastoidectomy approach, this study shows that it is in fact possible to preserve residual hearing using a non-mastoidectomy surgical technique for cochlear implantation. Nevertheless, more experience is necessary to answer the question whether this technique can be thoroughly recommended in cochlear implantation for electric-acoustic stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 602
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation
    Di Nardo, Walter
    Cantore, Italo
    Cianfrone, Francesca
    Melillo, Pietro
    Rigante, Mario
    Paludetti, Gaetano
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2007, 12 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [42] LOSS OF RESIDUAL HEARING AFTER COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION
    BOGGESS, WJ
    BAKER, JE
    BALKANY, TJ
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1989, 99 (10): : 1002 - 1005
  • [43] Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing
    Cullen, RD
    Higgins, C
    Buss, E
    Clark, M
    Pillsbury, HC
    Buchman, CA
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (12): : 2218 - 2223
  • [44] MEASURABLE RESIDUAL HEARING AFTER COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION
    HOUSE, WF
    OCONNOR, C
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1987, 97 (02) : 179 - 180
  • [45] Changes in residual hearing after cochlear implantation
    Leung, EKS
    Wong, TKC
    Tong, MCF
    van Hasselt, CA
    UPDATES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2000, 57 : 397 - 400
  • [46] Correlation of Scalar Cochlear Volume and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing
    Raeth, Mareike
    Schurzig, Daniel
    Timm, Max E.
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Warnecke, Athanasia
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (03) : 256 - 265
  • [47] Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach
    Erixon, Elsa
    Kobler, Susanne
    Rask-Andersen, Helge
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2012, 132 (09) : 923 - 931
  • [48] Eluting Electrodes for Hearing Preservation - the Future of Cochlear Implantation?
    Nikookam, Y.
    Radotra, A.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Muzaffar, J.
    Monksfield, P.
    Bance, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [49] Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
    Souter, Melanie
    Eastwood, Hayden
    Marovic, Paul
    Kel, Gordana
    Wongprasartsuk, Sarin
    Ryan, Allen F.
    O'Leary, Stephen John
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 532 - 538
  • [50] Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation
    Gstoettner, W
    Kiefer, J
    Baumgartner, WD
    Pok, S
    Peters, S
    Adunka, O
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (04) : 348 - 352