Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Validity and reliability of different versions of the scale - review

被引:0
|
作者
Albinski, Rafal [1 ]
Kleszczewska-Albinska, Angelika [2 ]
Bedynska, Sylwia [2 ]
机构
[1] Szkola Wyzsza Psychologii Spolecznej Warszawie, Interdyscyplinarne Ctr Stosowanych Badan Poznawcz, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Szkola Wyzsza Psychologii Spolecznej Warszawie, Wydzial Psychologii, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
depression; old age; Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS); SHORT-FORM; COMMUNITY SAMPLE; VALIDATION; INPATIENTS; ACCURACY; SYMPTOMS; CHINESE; GDS-15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Diagnosing depression in the elderly poses a serious problem because of the ageing process and various diseases that influence and mask symptoms of depressed mood. For instance, depression is often confused with dementia. It is therefore crucial to use a diagnostic tool that takes these problems into account. The presented paper is a review of the recently published studies concerning the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The properties of the original 30-items version of the GDS are described, along with the information on shorter versions of the scale (i.e. the scales consisting of 20, 15, 12, 10, 5, and 4 items). The psychometric properties i.e. validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the original version of GDS are presented. Also presented is the information on scoring for both 30- and 15-item version of the scale. The results of the studies concerning shorter versions of the GDS were discussed in the context of their usability in various settings. Different ways of administering the GDS are mentioned. In the last part of the article, general problems concerning diagnostic usability of the Geriatric Depression Scale are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15): Czech normative study
    Heissler, Radek
    Cervenkova, Marketa
    Kopecek, Miloslav
    Georgi, Hana
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2020, 64 (01): : 49 - 65
  • [42] The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in Acute Geriatrics, Rehabilitation and Day Hospital
    Hager, K.
    Brecht, M.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2016, 49 : S120 - S121
  • [43] Factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in chronic stroke patients
    Ketterson, TU
    Moore, AB
    Pekich, DG
    Blonder, LX
    Rothi, LG
    Pickett, TC
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 19 (07) : 943 - 944
  • [44] Clinical and Psychometric Validation of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) for Portuguese Elders
    Pocinho, Margarida T. S.
    Farate, Carlos
    Dias, Carlos A.
    Lee, Tina T.
    Yesavage, Jerome A.
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 32 (02) : 223 - 236
  • [45] Validation of the Spanish version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS) in primary care
    Fernández-San Martín, MI
    Andrade, C
    Molina, J
    Muñoz, PE
    Carretero, B
    Rodríguez, M
    Silva, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 (03) : 279 - 287
  • [46] Validity of the three apathy items of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-3A) in measuring apathy in older persons
    Bertens, Anne Suzanne
    Moonen, Justine E. F.
    de Waal, Margot W. M.
    Foster-Dingley, Jessica C.
    de Ruijter, Wouter
    Gussekloo, Jacobijn
    van der Mast, Roos C.
    de Craen, Anton J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 32 (04) : 421 - 428
  • [47] A new version of the geriatric depression scale for nursing and residential home populations: The geriatric depression scale (residential) (GDS-12R)
    Sutcliffe, C
    Cordingley, L
    Burns, A
    Mozley, CG
    Bagley, H
    Huxley, P
    Challis, D
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2000, 12 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [49] Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience
    Katsunori Sumi
    Social Indicators Research, 2014, 118 : 601 - 615
  • [50] A reliability generalization study of the geriatric depression scale
    Kieffer, KM
    Reese, RJ
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 62 (06) : 969 - 994