Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the management of recurrent abortion secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome

被引:52
|
作者
Fouda, Usama M. [1 ]
Sayed, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Abdou, Abdel-Megid A. [1 ]
Ramadan, Dalia I. [2 ]
Fouda, Iman M. [3 ]
Zaki, Mahmoud M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Clin & Chem Pathol, Fac Med, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Natl Res Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Giza, Egypt
[4] Portsaid Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portsaid, Egypt
关键词
Antiphospholipid syndrome; Enoxaparin; Low molecular weight heparin; Recurrent abortion; Unfractionated heparin; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; PREGNANCY LOSS; WOMEN; ANTIBODIES; ANTICOAGULANT; MISCARRIAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) plus low-dose aspirin (LDA) is comparable in efficacy and safety to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus LDA in the management of pregnant women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods: In a randomized prospective study, 60 women with a history of 3 or more consecutive spontaneous abortions and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were assigned in equal numbers to receive either UFH (5000 units, twice daily) plus LDA, or LMWH (enoxaparin 40 mg, once daily) plus LDA as soon as pregnancy was diagnosed. Results: Twenty-four women in the LMWH group (80%) and 20 women in the UFH group (66.67%) delivered a viable infant (P=0.243). There were no significant differences in pregnancy complications or neonatal morbidity between the 2 groups. There were no incidences of excessive bleeding, thrombocytopenia, or osteoporotic fractures in either group. Conclusion: LMWH plus LDA was successfully used as an alternative to UFH plus LDA in the management of recurrent abortion secondary to APS. The results highlight the need for a larger randomized controlled trial to determine whether LMWH plus LDA should be the treatment of choice for recurrent abortion secondary to APS. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01051778. (C) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 215
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heparin/aspirin do not help antiphospholipid-positive women with recurrent spontaneous abortion
    Stern, K.
    Kornman, L.
    Norris, H.
    Hale, L.
    Baker, H. W. G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 57 - 57
  • [42] Evaluation of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with liver disease.
    Davis, Kyle
    Dietrich, Eric
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 37 (06): : E39 - E39
  • [43] The economic impact of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in acute ischemic stroke patients
    Pineo, Graham F.
    Lin, Jay
    Annemans, Lieven
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 4 : 99 - 107
  • [44] Comparing full dose & half dose enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    Abd El Kader, M.
    Saleh, A.
    Gomaa, Y.
    Morttada, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 582 - 582
  • [45] Unfractionated Heparin Three Times a Day versus Enoxaparin in the Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Trauma Patients
    Arnold, Joshua D.
    Dart, Benjamin W.
    Barker, Donald E.
    Maxwell, Robert A.
    Burkholder, Hans C.
    Mejia, Vicente A.
    Smith, Philip W.
    Longley, Joy M.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2010, 76 (06) : 563 - 570
  • [46] ENOXAPARIN IS COST-SAVING AS PROPHYLACTIC THERAPY VERSUS UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN OR NO PROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALISED MEDICAL PATIENTS
    Feng, J.
    Yuen, C.
    Jackson, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A392 - A392
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Poland - Modelling study from the hospital perspective
    Orlewska, E
    Budaj, A
    Tereszkowski-Kaminski, D
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (10) : 737 - 748
  • [48] Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with tirofiban, aspirin, and an early conservation initial management strategy: Results from the A phase of the A to Z trial
    de Lemos, JA
    Blazing, MA
    White, HD
    Fox, KA
    DiBattiste, PM
    Palmisano, J
    Bilheimer, DW
    Brady, WE
    Gardner, LH
    Ramsey, KE
    Lewis, EF
    Pfeffer, MA
    Califf, RM
    Braunwald, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 302A - 302A
  • [49] LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN (ENOXAPARIN) VERSUS UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN DURING AND AFTER ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SAMAMA, CM
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1993, 69 (06) : 546 - 546
  • [50] Unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in intensive care units: a propensity score adjusted analysis
    Samuel, Sophie
    Li, Wen
    Dunn, Koren
    Cortes, Jennifer
    Nguyen, Thuy
    Moussa, Daniel
    Kumar, Abhay
    Dao, Thanh
    Beeson, James
    Choi, H. Alex
    McCullough, Louise D.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2023, 55 (04) : 617 - 625