Composition of Fecal Microbiota in Grazing and Feedlot Angus Beef Cattle

被引:22
|
作者
Zhang, Zhimin [1 ]
Yang, Li [2 ]
He, Yang [2 ]
Luo, Xinmao [2 ]
Zhao, Shaokang [2 ]
Jia, Xianbo [2 ]
机构
[1] Xichang Univ, Coll Anim Sci, Xichang 615000, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Agr Univ, Farm Anim Genet Resources Explorat & Innovat Key, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
fecal microbioa; grazing cattle; Angus beef; 16S rRNA gene; BACTERIAL DIVERSITY; TRANSPLANTATION; FECES;
D O I
10.3390/ani11113167
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: This study is to investigate the difference of bovine fecal microbiota between grazing and feedlot Angus cattle. The fecal bacterial community was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene from six Angus cattle grazed on grassland and six Angus cattle fed on a feedlot. A total of 775 OTUs were taxonomically assigned to bacterial 12 phyla, 19 classes, 25 orders, 54 families, 141 genera, and 145 species. The dominant phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. There was similar species richness between grazing and feedlot Angus beef, while species diversity was higher in feedlot Angus beef. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia and Patescibacteria was significantly different between grazing and feedlot Angus beef (p < 0.05). At the genus level, five microbiotas were significantly different microbiotas between the two groups and all belonged to the Firmicutes phylum. These significant differences in microbiota composition between grazing and feedlot Angus beef may have an impact on the meat quality of Angus beef.This study is to investigate the difference in bovine fecal microbiota between grazing and feedlot Angus cattle. Fecal samples were collected from six Angus cattle grazed on grassland and six Angus cattle fed on a feedlot. The fecal bacterial community was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing of the V3-V4 region totally produced 1,113,170 effective tages that were computationally clustered into 775 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These 775 OTUs were taxonomically assigned to bacterial 12 phyla, 19 classes, 25 orders, 54 families, 141 genera, and 145 species. The dominant phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. There was similar species richness between grazing and feedlot Angus beef, while higher species diversity was observed in feedlot Angus beef. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia and Patescibacteria was significantly different between grazing and feedlot Angus beef (p < 0.05). At a genus level, five microbiotas were significantly different between the two groups and all belonged to the Firmicutes phylum. These significant differences in microbiota composition between grazing and feedlot Angus beef may have an impact on the meat quality of Angus beef.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibiotic treatment in feedlot cattle: a longitudinal study of the effect of oxytetracycline and tulathromycin on the fecal and nasopharyngeal microbiota
    Devin B. Holman
    Wenzhu Yang
    Trevor W. Alexander
    Microbiome, 7
  • [22] Working chute behavior of feedlot cattle can be an indication of cattle temperament and beef carcass composition and quality
    Hall, Noah L.
    Buchanan, David S.
    Anderson, Vernon L.
    Ilse, Breanne R.
    Carlin, Kasey R.
    Berg, Eric P.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [23] Antibiotic treatment in feedlot cattle: a longitudinal study of the effect of oxytetracycline and tulathromycin on the fecal and nasopharyngeal microbiota
    Holman, Devin B.
    Yang, Wenzhu
    Alexander, Trevor W.
    MICROBIOME, 2019, 7 (1)
  • [24] Evolution of the nasopharyngeal microbiota of beef cattle from weaning to 40 days after arrival at a feedlot
    Timsit, Edouard
    Workentine, Matthew
    Schryvers, Anthony B.
    Holman, Devin B.
    van der Meer, Frank
    Alexander, Trevor W.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 187 : 75 - 81
  • [25] The nasopharyngeal microbiota of beef cattle before and after transport to a feedlot (vol 17, 70, 2017)
    Holman, Devin B.
    Timsit, Edouard
    Amat, Samat
    Abbott, D. Wade
    Buret, Andre G.
    Alexander, Trevor W.
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [26] Physical composition of carcass and meat characteristics of beef cattle finished in feedlot with different diets
    Roman, J.
    Jobim, C. C.
    Resende, F. D.
    Siqueira, G. R.
    Faria, M. H.
    Rivas, R.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2010, 62 (06) : 1430 - 1438
  • [27] Assessment of Rumen Microbiota in Beef Cattle with Different Feed Efficiency Grazing on an Oat Pasture
    Liu, J.
    Lansink, N.
    Bork, E.
    Carlyle, C.
    Plastow, G.
    Guan, L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 192 - 192
  • [28] CROSSING ANGUS AND MILKING SHORTHORN CATTLE - FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE OF STEERS
    DREWRY, KJ
    BECKER, SP
    MARTIN, TG
    NELSON, LA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1979, 48 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [29] Preference of beef cattle for feedlot or pasture environments
    Lee, Caroline
    Fisher, Andrew D.
    Colditz, Ian G.
    Lea, Jim M.
    Ferguson, Drewe M.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2013, 145 (3-4) : 53 - 59
  • [30] BEEF-CATTLE FEEDLOT MANURE MANAGEMENT
    EGHBALL, B
    POWER, JF
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1994, 49 (02) : 113 - 122