Chemotherapy response score as a prognostic tool in patients with advanced stage endometrial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Jani, Ina [1 ]
Lastra, Ricardo R. [2 ]
Brito, Katherine S. [3 ]
Liao, Chuanhong [4 ]
Lazo, Isabel [1 ]
Lee, Nita Karnik [1 ]
Yamada, S. Diane [1 ]
Kurnit, Katherine C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Gynecol Oncol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Pathol, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
endometrial neoplasms; pathology; cytoreduction surgical procedures; HISTOPATHOLOGIC RESPONSE; TUMOR-REGRESSION; CANCER; IV; VALIDATION; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2020-002202
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Chemotherapy response score (CRS) applied to interval debulking specimens quantifies histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma and correlates with progression-free and overall survival. Objective To investigate whether the chemotherapy response score could be applied to interval debulking specimens in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma and be a prognostic indicator. Methods The study included patients with clinical stage III-IV endometrial carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Chemotherapy response scores were assigned to omental and adnexal metastases, and categorized as no/minimal (CRS1), partial (CRS2), and complete/near-complete (CRS3) response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline characteristics and feasibility of chemotherapy response score assessment. Univariate analyses were used to evaluate associations between the chemotherapy response score, complete cytoreduction, and survival. Results This study included 40 patients. The median age was 63.5 years, and 31 patients (78%) had stage IV disease. Thirty patients had an omentectomy, 22 patients (73%) had an omental chemotherapy response score assigned. Thirty-nine patients had a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 28 patients (72%) had an adnexal chemotherapy response score assigned. Omental CRS2 and CRS3 were associated with improved progression-free survival (CRS2: HR=0.18, p<0.01; CRS3: HR=0.11, p<0.01) and overall survival (CRS2: HR=0.10, p<0.01; CRS3: HR=0.16, p=0.04). Adnexal CRS2 and CRS3 were associated with improved progression-free survival (CRS2: HR=0.23, p<0.01; CRS3: HR=0.20, p=0.03). Chemotherapy response scores were also associated with an increased likelihood of having a complete cytoreduction. Conclusion Chemotherapy response score can be applied to omental and adnexal metastases in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma and was associated with survival and complete cytoreduction. The score may be a prognostic indicator and help to guide first-line treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Correlation of Response and Prognostic Markers with Survival in Locally Advanced NSCLC Patients Who Have Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Altundag, Ozden
    Kucukortas, Nadire
    Rahatli, Samed
    Keskin, Gul Sema Yildiran
    Oguz, Arzu
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S570 - S570
  • [32] Assessment of the response in patients with colorectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy by PET and CT
    Ribelles, M.
    Arredondo, J.
    Prieto, E.
    Sancho, L.
    Garcia-Velloso, M.
    Hernandez, J.
    Richter, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S474 - S474
  • [33] Docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma
    Vallejo, CT
    Machiavelli, MR
    Pérez, JE
    Romero, AO
    Bologna, F
    Vicente, H
    Lacava, JA
    Ortiz, EH
    Cubero, A
    Focaccia, G
    Suttora, G
    Scenna, M
    Boughen, JM
    Leone, BA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 26 (05): : 477 - 482
  • [34] PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
    Fleming, N.
    Westin, S.
    Coleman, R.
    Soliman, P.
    Fellman, B.
    Meyer, L.
    Shafer, A.
    Rauh-Hain, A.
    Onstad, M.
    Jazaeri, A.
    Sood, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 676 - 676
  • [35] The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer
    Philp, L.
    Kanbergs, A.
    Laurent, J. St.
    Growdon, W. B.
    Feltmate, C.
    Goodman, A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 36
  • [36] THE USE OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    Philp, L.
    Kanbergs, A.
    St Laurent, J.
    Growdon, W.
    Feltmate, C.
    Goodman, A. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A181 - A182
  • [37] Prognostic score in patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy
    Magnes, Teresa
    Melchardt, Thomas
    Weiss, Lukas
    Mittermair, Christof
    Neureiter, Daniel
    Klieser, Eckhard
    Gampenrieder, Simon
    Moser, Gerhard
    Gaggl, Alexander
    Greil, Richard
    Egle, Alexander
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [38] Morphologic response evaluation of gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Becker, K
    Mueller, J
    Fink, U
    Busch, R
    Siewert, JR
    Höfler, H
    PATHOLOGY OF INVASION AND METASTASIS: PATHOLOGY OF PULMONARY DISEASES, 2000, 84 : 164 - 174
  • [39] SerpinB3, a new prognostic tool in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Elaina S. R. Collie-Duguid
    Kathleen Sweeney
    Keith N. Stewart
    Iain D. Miller
    Elizabeth Smyth
    Steven D. Heys
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 132 : 807 - 818
  • [40] SerpinB3, a new prognostic tool in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Collie-Duguid, Elaina S. R.
    Sweeney, Kathleen
    Stewart, Keith N.
    Miller, Iain D.
    Smyth, Elizabeth
    Heys, Steven D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (03) : 807 - 818