Training in office-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine in US residency programs: A national survey of residency program directors

被引:36
|
作者
Tesema, Lello [1 ]
Marshall, Jeffrey [2 ]
Hathaway, Rachel [3 ]
Pham, Christina [4 ]
Clarke, Camille [5 ]
Bergeron, Genevieve [3 ]
Yeh, James [6 ]
Soliman, Michael [7 ]
McCormick, Danny [3 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Cty Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Pulm & Crit Care Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Cambridge Hlth Alliance, Dept Med, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Buprenorphine; graduate medication education; knowledge; practices; and attitudes; office-based opioid treatment; SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS; PRIMARY-CARE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DEPENDENCE; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; PREPAREDNESS; DIAGNOSE; ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1080/08897077.2018.1449047
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) has increased sharply. Office-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine (OBOT) is effective but often underutilized because of physicians' lack of experience prescribing this therapy. Little is known about US residency training programs' provision of OBOT and addiction medicine training. Methods: The authors conducted a survey of residency program directors (RPDs) at all US residency programs in internal medicine, family medicine, and psychiatry to assess the frequency with which their residents provide care for OUD, presence and features of curricula in OBOT and addiction medicine, RPDs' beliefs about OBOT, and potential barriers to providing OBOT training. Results: The response rate was 49.5% (476 of 962). Although 76.9% of RPDs reported that residents frequently manage patients with OUD, only 23.5% reported that their program dedicates 12 or more hours of curricular time to addiction medicine, 35.9% reported that their program encourages/requires training in OBOT, and 22.6% reported that their program encourages/requires obtaining a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine. Most RPDs believe that OBOT is an important treatment option for OUD (88.1%) and that increased residency training in OBOT would improve access to OBOT (73.7%). The authors also found that programs whose RPD had favorable views of OBOT were more likely to provide OBOT and addiction medicine training. Psychiatry programs were most likely to provide OBOT training and their RPDs most likely to have beliefs about OBOT that were positive. Commonly cited barriers to implementing OBOT training include a lack of waivered preceptors (76.9%), competing curricular priorities (64.1%), and a lack of support (social work and counseling) services (54.0%). Conclusions: Internal medicine, family medicine, and psychiatry residents often care for patients with OUD, and most RPDs believe that increased residency training in OBOT would increase access to this treatment. Yet, only a minority of programs offer training in OBOT.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 440
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Procedural Headache Medicine in Neurology Training: A Survey of US Residency Program Directors
    Robbins, M. S.
    Robertson, C. E.
    Ailani, J.
    Levin, M.
    Friedman, D., I
    Dodick, D. W.
    HEADACHE, 2015, 55 : 160 - 160
  • [22] Procedural Headache Medicine in Neurology Residency Training: A Survey of US Program Directors
    Robbins, Matthew S.
    Robertson, Carrie E.
    Ailani, Jessica
    Levin, Morris
    Friedman, Deborah I.
    Dodick, David W.
    HEADACHE, 2016, 56 (01): : 79 - 85
  • [23] Residency Training in Handoffs: a Survey of Program Directors in Psychiatry
    Melissa R. Arbuckle
    Claudia L. Reardon
    John Q. Young
    Academic Psychiatry, 2015, 39 : 132 - 138
  • [24] Residency Training in Handoffs: a Survey of Program Directors in Psychiatry
    Arbuckle, Melissa R.
    Reardon, Claudia L.
    Young, John Q.
    ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 39 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [25] Evidence based medicine training in residency: A survey of urology program directors
    Dahm, Philipp
    Fesperman, Susan F.
    Turpen, Ryan M.
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    Vieweg, Johannes
    Cohen, Marc S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 1 - 1
  • [26] Training on Ethnic and Gender Issues in Psychiatry Residency ProgramsA National Survey of Residency Training Directors
    Roy King
    Cheryl Koopman
    David Millis
    Academic Psychiatry, 1999, 23 : 20 - 29
  • [27] Diversity in Otolaryngology Residency Programs: A Survey of Otolaryngology Program Directors
    Newsome, Hillary
    Faucett, Erynne A.
    Chelius, Thomas
    Flanary, Valerie
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 158 (06) : 995 - 1001
  • [28] Nephrology elective experience during medical residency: a national survey of US nephrology fellowship training program directors
    Shah, Hitesh H.
    Adams, Nancy Day
    Mattana, Joseph
    Kadiyala, Aditya
    Jhaveri, Kenar D.
    RENAL FAILURE, 2015, 37 (06) : 999 - 1006
  • [29] THE STATE OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY TRAINING IN GENERAL PSYCHIATRY RESIDENCY: DATA FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY OF US PROGRAM DIRECTORS
    Meyen, Rachel
    Conroy, Michelle
    Forester, Brent P.
    Hobbs, Katherine
    Kirwin, Paul D.
    Schillerstrom, Jason
    Wilkins, Kirsten
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 27 (03): : S163 - S163
  • [30] Use of educational games in residency training:: A survey of us internal medicine program directors
    Akl, E. A.
    Mustafa, R. A.
    Wilson, M. C.
    Moheet, A.
    SchueNemann, H. J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 : 433 - 433