How to choose the best category for a protected area? A multicriteria analysis method based on ecosystem services conservation

被引:5
|
作者
Figueiroa, Apoena Calixto [1 ]
de Lima, Andre de Souza [1 ]
Garcia Scherer, Marinez Eymael [1 ]
Bonetti, Jarbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Ctr Filosofia & Ciencias Humanas, Dept Geociencias, Campus Univ, BR-88040970 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Ecosystem services; Analytic hierarchy process; Spatial analysis; Management categories; Carijos Ecological Station; LAND-USE; KNOWLEDGE; CARIJOS;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-020-08333-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study proposes a novel methodology to define protected area (PA) categories based on the analysis of how much a PA can protect important ecosystem services (ESs). PA are important tools to minimize the continuing global biodiversity conservation crisis. However, the contribution of PA to conservation is variable, mainly due to the diverse management categories with which they can be associated. In order to support the assignment of a PA to a management category, a multicriteria analysis (MCA) strategy was developed. Essentially, it consisted of the application of an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its association to management categories that could support the conservation of the most significant ESs. To test the methodology, the framework was applied to the Carijos Ecological Station (ESEC Carijos), Santa Catarina, Brazil, and its surrounding area of influence. Using the IUCN list of categories for the case study, it was found that IUCN Ia and IV could be the most efficient measures to protect important ESs at ESEC Carijos. Although the methodology was applied to a particular case, it could be employed worldwide, establishing the best category to be assigned to an existing or proposed potential PA.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] How Rising Water Levels Altered Ecosystem Provisioning Services of the Area around Qinghai Lake from 2000 to 2020: An InVEST-RF-GTWR Combined Method
    Wang, Lei
    Mao, Xufeng
    Song, Xiuhua
    Tang, Wenjia
    Wang, Wenying
    Yu, Hongyan
    Deng, Yanfang
    Zhang, Ziping
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Zhou, Huakun
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [42] Quantitative Analysis about the Spatial Heterogeneity of Water Conservation Services Function Using a Space-Time Cube Constructed Based on Ecosystem and Soil Types
    Liu, Yisheng
    Hou, Peng
    Wang, Ping
    Zhu, Jian
    Zhai, Jun
    Chen, Yan
    Wang, Jiahao
    Xie, Le
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2024, 16 (10):
  • [43] Ecosystem services linked sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation based on emergy analysis: Case study in the Tibetan area of Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China
    Zhou, Zheng
    Gao, Ya
    Dong, Xiaobin
    Wang, Xue-Chao
    Zhang, Yufang
    Xiao, Xiaomin
    Xiao, Ruiming
    Ye, Qiaoru
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 167
  • [44] An analysis of multiple ecosystem services in a large-scale urbanized area of northern China based on the food-energy-water integrative framework
    Zhou, Siyang
    Li, Wei
    Lu, Zhonggui
    Yue, Rongwu
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 98
  • [45] Multi-Objective Optimization of the Spatial Structure and Layout of the Protected Area Based on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Yellow River's Headwaters Region in the Three-River-Source National Park
    LIU Menghao
    XI Jianchao
    Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 2021, 9 (03) : 57 - 77
  • [46] Multi-Objective Optimization of the Spatial Structure and Layout of the Protected Area Based on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Yellow River's Headwaters Region in the Three-River-Source National Park
    Liu Menghao
    Xi Jianchao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2021, 09 (03)
  • [47] Spatial Pattern Analysis of the Ecosystem Services in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery Based on Deep Learning Method
    Wen, Dawei
    Ma, Song
    Zhang, Anlu
    Ke, Xinli
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)