Creep behavior of boom clay

被引:29
|
作者
Yu, H. D. [1 ]
Chen, W. Z. [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Z. [1 ]
Tan, X. J. [1 ]
Ma, Y. S. [1 ]
Li, X. L. [3 ]
Sillen, X. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Beijing 100864, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Res Ctr Geotech & Struct Engn, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[3] CEN SCK, Euridice, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[4] Belgian Agcy Radioact Waste & Enriched Fissile Ma, ONDRAF, B-1210 Brussels, Belgium
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Boom clay; Creep; Tests; Creep rate; TIME-DEPENDENT DEFORMATION; HYDROMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.009
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Several creep tests (lasting more than one year) were performed to study the delayed mechanical behavior of Boom clay under the hydro-mechanical coupling effect. To prevent the soil from swelling as much as possible during re-saturation, the samples were submitted to a confining pressure close to the in situ effective mean stress (2.5 MPa) at a room temperature of 21 degrees C. However, certain swelling still exists at the beginning or the saturation. Creep tests further highlight the creep potential of Boom clay. Delayed behavior became more and more significant as the deviatoric stress increased. A deviatoric stress threshold (approximately 1.0 MPa), below which only primary creep occurred, was proved to exist from the development of secondary and tertiary creep phases during the creep tests. If we introduce a quasi-steady state creep rate, i.e., the average creep rate after the creep deformation becoming stable, it can be found that the quasi-steady state creep rate of Boom clay is on the order of 10(-6) epsilon/h under low deviatoric stress (1.5 MPa) in the laboratory, which is on the same order as the average creep rate of the in situ measurements in the second year (1988). However, in situ measurements show that steady creep state of the host rock was not reached even after five years. The in situ quasi-steady state diameter reduction rate calculated from the average of 10 years (1996-2006) of stable deformation of the tunnel linings is on the order of 10(-8) epsilon/h. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 264
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical simulation of creep behavior of clay using discrete element method
    Shahabi, Hossein
    Mirghasemi, Ali Asghar
    Khabazian, Moein
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 432
  • [32] Undrained creep behavior of a compacted clay under low confining pressure
    Qiu-yang Pei
    Wei-lie Zou
    Zhong Han
    Xie-qun Wang
    Ke-wei Fan
    Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 2023, 27 : 629 - 649
  • [33] Creep Behavior of the Clay Cores at the Bougdoura Dam Using Ansys Software
    Ghouilem, K.
    Atlaoui, D.
    Merakeb, S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [34] Creep Behavior of Red-Clay Under Triaxial Compression Condition
    Xue, Kaixi
    Wang, Shengfu
    Hu, Yanxiang
    Li, Mingdong
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [35] MIGRATION STUDIES OF RADIONUCLIDES IN BOOM CLAY
    HENRION, PN
    MONSECOUR, M
    PUT, M
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1985, 21 (3-4) : 311 - 319
  • [36] Study on the hydraulic conductivity of Boom clay
    Deng, Yong-Feng
    Tang, Anh-Minh
    Cui, Yu-Jun
    Li, Xiang-Ling
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (10) : 1461 - 1470
  • [37] INSITU PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BOOM CLAY
    BAEYENS, B
    MAES, A
    CREMERS, A
    HENRION, PN
    RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, 1985, 6 (3-4): : 391 - 408
  • [38] Yielding and plastic behaviour of Boom clay
    Sultan, N.
    Cui, Y. -J.
    Delage, P.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2010, 60 (09): : 657 - 666
  • [39] The Boom Clay geochemistry: Natural evidence
    De Craen, M.
    Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX, 2006, 932 : 1033 - 1040
  • [40] Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling of the shear creep behavior of an overconsolidated soft clay
    Ding, Pan
    Xu, Riqing
    Hu, Yayuan
    Xie, Jiaqi
    Ju, Luying
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 79 (06) : 3063 - 3073