Effects of e-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: a review of systematic qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies reviews (protocol)

被引:14
|
作者
Rouleau, Genevieve [1 ,2 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [1 ,3 ]
Cote, Jose [2 ,4 ]
Payne-Gagnon, Julie [3 ]
Hudson, Emilie [2 ,5 ]
Bouix-Picasso, Julien [4 ,6 ]
Dubois, Carl-Ardy [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Hosp Res Ctr CRCHUM, Res Chair Innovat Nursing Practices, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] St Francis Assisi Hosp, CHU Quebec Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Nursing Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Ingram Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Paris 13 Sorbonne, Dept Hlth Sci Pedag, Paris, France
[7] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Management Evaluat & Hlth Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 10期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
TOOL; INTERVENTIONS; OVERVIEWS; NURSES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018441
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Continuing education (CE) is imperative to the future of professional nursing. The use of e-learning by registered nurses for CE is spreading. A review of systematic reviews will be conducted to develop a broad picture of the effects of e-learning in a CE context on nursing care. Methods and analysis Systematic qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies reviews published in English, French or Spanish from 1 January 2006 will be included. The outcomes of interest will be extracted and analysed inductively and deductively from the Nursing Care Performance Framework; some themes include nursing resources, nurses' practice environment, processes, professional satisfaction, and nursing sensitive outcomes. Three reviewers will independently screen first the title and abstract of the papers, and then the full texts in order to assess eligibility. Two teams of two reviewers will extract the selected reviews' characteristics and data. The results from various types of reviews will be integrated using a data-based convergent synthesis design. We will conduct a thematic synthesis and transform all quantitative and mixed data into qualitative data. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for review of systematic reviews. We will summarise evidence concerning the negative, neutral and positive effects of various forms of e-learning on different aspects of nursing care. If we find gaps in the literature, we will highlight them and suggest ideas for further research. We will also focus on positive effects and present, if possible, the components and characteristics of e-learning interventions that were found to be successful. We will present this protocol and results in international conferences in nursing, medical, and health informatics domains. We will also submit the results of our work for peer-review publication in a journal indexed in the international bibliographic database of biomedical information.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asynchronous e-learning with technology-enabled and enhanced training for continuing education of nurses: a scoping review
    Kimura, Rika
    Matsunaga, Mayumi
    Barroga, Edward
    Hayashi, Naoko
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Learning Outcomes and Educational Effectiveness of E-Learning as a Continuing Professional Development Intervention for Practicing Surgeons and Proceduralists: A Systematic Review
    Williams, Erin
    Del Fernandes, Rosephine
    Choi, Ken
    Fasola, Laurie
    Zevin, Boris
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (08) : 1139 - 1149
  • [43] Influence of e-learning on the students' of higher education in the digital era: A systematic literature review
    Singh, Rashmi
    Singh, Shailendra Kumar
    Mishra, Niraj
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (15) : 20201 - 20221
  • [44] A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education
    Regmi, Krishna
    Jones, Linda
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [45] Does E-learning Improve Plastic Surgery Education? A Systematic Review of Asynchronous Resources
    Lin, Ines C.
    Lee, Alfred
    Mauch, Jaclyn T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (1S) : S40 - S51
  • [46] A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring peer learning experiences of undergraduate nursing students
    Nelwati
    Abdullah, Khatijah Lim
    Chan, Chong Mei
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 71 : 185 - 192
  • [47] Nursing interventions to improve care of people with dementia in hospital: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Moody, Elaine
    Weeks, Lori E.
    Belliveau, Anne
    Bilski, Trish
    Rothfus, Melissa
    McDougall, Heather
    Jamieson, Hannah
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (03) : 899 - 906
  • [48] A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education
    Krishna Regmi
    Linda Jones
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [49] Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence
    Cerigo, Helen
    Quesnel-Vallee, Amelie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 65 (05) : 699 - 703
  • [50] Effects of e-learning technologies on university librarians and libraries: a systematic literature review
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Khan, Shakeel Ahmad
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2023, : 528 - 554