Large scale tertiary CO2 EOR in mature water flooded Norwegian oil fields

被引:15
|
作者
Lindeberg, Erik [1 ]
Grimstad, Alv-Arne [1 ]
Bergmo, Per [1 ]
Wessel-Berg, Dag [1 ]
Torsaeter, Malin [1 ]
Holt, Torleif [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Petr Res, SP Andresens Vei 15b, N-7031 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
CO2; EOR; aqifers storage; capacity; economy; negative CO2 footprint;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1851
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A technical-economical model for a large-scale infrastructure combining CO2 EOR and aquifer storage has been used to construct a scenario including 23 Norwegian Continental Shelf oil fields that have been identified as potential candidates for CO2 flooding. In the injection scenario, 70 million tonnes of CO2 is injected annually over 40 years. A limited sensitivity analysis has been performed. The EOR potential for continuous CO2 injection is estimated to be between 276 and 351 million Sm3. This corresponds to 5.9 and 7.6 % of the oil originally in place depending on the oil price (low/high: 40/120 USD/bbl), the cost of CO2 that the oil producers must pay for all stored CO2 (low/high: 0/50 USD/tonne) and well costs (low/high 25/42 million USD/well). In addition to transportation costs through the main pipeline (8 USD/tonne) specific costs for aquifer deposition also applies (8 USD/tonne). CO2 mass balance calculations show that more CO2 is stored in the oil reservoirs during tertiary flooding compared to the CO2 formed by combustion of the produced oil. The CO2 footprint becomes even more negative when the CO2 stored in aquifers is included in the calculations. (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7096 / 7106
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on microscopic oil displacement mechanism of CO2 EOR in extra-high water cut reservoirs
    Cui, Maolei
    Wang, Rui
    Lv, Chengyuan
    Tang, Yongqiang
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 154 : 315 - 321
  • [32] Data-driven modeling for forecasting oil recovery: A timeseries neural network approach for tertiary CO2 WAG EOR
    Asante, Jonathan
    Ampomah, William
    Tu, Jiawei
    Cather, Martha
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 233
  • [33] Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations
    Tapia, John Frederick D.
    Lee, Jui-Yuan
    Ooi, Raymond E. H.
    Foo, Dominic C. Y.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 : 337 - 345
  • [34] Modeling oil saturation evolution in residual oil zones: Implications for CO2 EOR and sequestration
    Ren, Bo
    Duncan, Ian
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 177 : 528 - 539
  • [35] Mutual Interactions of CO2/Oil and Natural Gas/Oil Systems and Their Effects on the EOR Process
    Ding, M.
    Wang, Y.
    Liu, D.
    Wang, W.
    Chen, W.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (23-24) : 1890 - 1900
  • [37] Modeling and investigation of CO2 diffusivity in formation water in CO2-EOR process
    Pourjafar, Sara
    Jabbari, Hadi
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [38] Uncertainty quantification for CO2 storage during intermittent CO2-EOR in oil reservoirs
    Rezk, Mohamed Gamal
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Farid
    Adebayo, Abdulrauf R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2023, 266
  • [39] A life cycle analysis of incremental oil produced via CO2 EOR
    Azzolina, Nicholas A.
    Hamling, John A.
    Peck, Wesley D.
    Gorecki, Charles D.
    Nakles, David V.
    Melzer, L. Stephen
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6588 - 6596
  • [40] Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage
    Allinson, Ken
    Burt, Dan
    Campbell, Lisa
    Constable, Lisa
    Crombie, Mark
    Lee, Arthur
    Lima, Vinicius
    Lloyd, Tim
    Solsbey, Lee
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6950 - 6956