Diagnostic triage in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis using a deep learning system of radiographs

被引:16
|
作者
Kim, Tackeun [1 ]
Kim, Young-Gon [2 ,3 ]
Park, Seyeon [2 ]
Lee, Jae-Koo [1 ]
Lee, Chang-Hyun [1 ,4 ]
Hyun, Seung-Jae [1 ,5 ]
Kim, Chi Heon [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Ki-Jeong [1 ,5 ]
Chung, Chun Kee [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Transdisciplinary Dept Med & Adv Technol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, AI Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Coll Nat Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
spinal stenosis; deep learning; convolutional neural network; radiograph; artificial intelligence; triage; lumbar; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.3171/2021.11.SPINE211136
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard tool for diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but it is difficult to promptly examine all suspected cases with MRI considering the modality's high cost and limited accessibility. Although radiography is an efficient screening technique owing to its low cost, rapid operability, and wide availability, its diagnostic accuracy is relatively poor. In this study, the authors aimed to develop a deep learning model with a convolutional neural network (CNN) for diagnosing severe central LSS using radiography and to evaluate radiological diagnostic features using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). METHODS Patients who had undergone both spinal MRI and radiography in the period from May 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017, were screened. According to the formal MRI report, participants were consecutively included in the severe central LSS or healthy control group, and radiographs for both groups were collected. A CNN-based transfer learning algorithm was developed to classify radiographic findings as LSS or normal (binary classification). The proposed models were evaluated using six performance metrics: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS The VGG19 model achieved the highest accuracy with an AUROC of 90.0% (95% CI 89.8%-90.3%) by training 12,442 images. Accuracy was 82.8% (95% CI 82.5%-83.1%) by averaging 5-fold models. Feature points on Grad-CAM were reasonable, and the features could be categorized into reduced disc height, narrow foramina, short pedicle, and hyperdense facet joint. The AUROC in the extra validation was 89.3% (95% CI 88.7%-90.0%). Accuracy was 81.8% (95% CI 80.6%-83.0%) by averaging 5-fold models. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a combination of demographic factors (age and sex) did not improve the model performance. CONCLUSIONS The algorithm trained by a CNN to identify central LSS on radiographs showed high diagnostic accuracy and is expected to be useful as a triage tool. The algorithm could accurately localize the stenotic lesion to assist physicians in the identification of LSS.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis - A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests
    de Graaf, I
    Prak, A
    Bierma-Zeinstra, S
    Thomas, S
    Peul, W
    Koes, B
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (10) : 1168 - 1176
  • [42] Diagnostic value of electrical stimulation of lumbosacral roots in lumbar spinal stenosis
    Zileli, B
    Ertekin, C
    Zileli, M
    Yünten, N
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 105 (03): : 221 - 227
  • [43] Deep learning for automated, interpretable classification of lumbar spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy from axial MRI
    Bharadwaj, Upasana Upadhyay
    Christine, Miranda
    Li, Steven
    Chou, Dean
    Pedoia, Valentina
    Link, Thomas M.
    Chin, Cynthia T.
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 3435 - 3443
  • [44] Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies
    Ewald, C.
    Kalff, R.
    NERVENARZT, 2011, 82 (12): : 1623 - 1629
  • [45] Deep learning for automated, interpretable classification of lumbar spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy from axial MRI
    Upasana Upadhyay Bharadwaj
    Miranda Christine
    Steven Li
    Dean Chou
    Valentina Pedoia
    Thomas M. Link
    Cynthia T. Chin
    Sharmila Majumdar
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 3435 - 3443
  • [46] Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Classifying Foraminal Stenosis Using Cervical Spine Radiographs
    Park, Jiho
    Yang, Jaejun
    Park, Sehan
    Kim, Jihie
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [47] Deep Learning Automates Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters on Lateral Lumbar Radiographs
    Schwartz, John T.
    Cho, Brian H.
    Tang, Peter
    Schefflein, Javin
    Arvind, Varun
    Kim, Jun S.
    Doshi, Amish H.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (12) : E671 - E678
  • [48] Neuropathic Pin Components in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Park, Si Young
    An, Howard S.
    Moon, Seong Hwan
    Lee, Hwan Mo
    Suh, Seung Woo
    Chen, Ding
    Jeon, Jin Ho
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 1044 - 1050
  • [49] Epidural Glucocorticoid Injections in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Andersson, Gunnar B. J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (01): : 75 - 76
  • [50] The effect of postlaminectomy spinal instability on the outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis patients
    Mullin, BB
    Rea, GL
    Irsik, R
    Catton, M
    Miner, ME
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1996, 9 (02): : 107 - 116