Evaluation of Two Instrumental Methods of Comparing Writing Paper

被引:2
|
作者
Kumar, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] State Forens Sci Lab, Phys & Ballist Div, Junga, Shimla, India
关键词
forensic science; paper quality; tensile strength; tensile index; tension length; fluorescence;
D O I
10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01661.x
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
An organization had approved the sample of writing paper, and accordingly the supplier had to execute the supply. The supply received was suspected to be of different quality from approved one. The organization sent the samples for comparison to the Forensic Science Laboratory. Both the approved and supplied samples were compared using Tensile Testing Method with the Material Testing Machine and Fluorescence and spectral analysis using the Video Spectral Comparator (VSC2000). The difference between the mean loads at peak before rupture in the tensile testing mode for the two samples was about 33%. The two samples differed significantly in terms of UV fluorescence, and there was about 5% average difference in the percentage of maximum reflected intensity in the wavelength region of 400-900 nm. It has been observed in this study that these two methods can adequately distinguish paper samples of different origin.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:514 / 517
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing two methods-agreeing to disagree?
    Choi, S. W.
    Lam, D. M. H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (05) : 651 - 653
  • [42] Comparing Two Different Option Pricing Methods
    Bondi, Alessandro
    Radojicic, Dragana
    Rheinlaender, Thorsten
    RISKS, 2020, 8 (04) : 1 - 28
  • [43] Comparing two methods for estimating network size
    McCarty, C
    Killworth, PD
    Bernard, HR
    Johnsen, EC
    Shelley, GA
    HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2001, 60 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [44] Comparing Two Methods of Delivering Neuropsychological Feedback
    Fallows, Robert R.
    Hilsabeck, Robin C.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (02) : 180 - 188
  • [45] Inferential methods for comparing two single cases
    Crawford, John R.
    Garthwaite, Paul H.
    Wood, Liam T.
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 27 (05) : 377 - 400
  • [46] Comparing two methods to evaluate apical transportation
    Leonardi, L
    Atlas, D
    Raiden, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B10 - B10
  • [47] COMPARING TWO METHODS FOR CROWDSOURCING SPEECH TRANSCRIPTION
    Sprugnoli, Rachele
    Moretti, Giovanni
    Fuoli, Matteo
    Giuliani, Diego
    Bentivogli, Luisa
    Pianta, Emanuele
    Gretter, Roberto
    Brugnara, Fabio
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2013, : 8116 - 8120
  • [48] Comparing two methods for calculating phantom scatter
    McDonough, J
    Xiao, Y
    Bjärngard, BE
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (02): : N9 - N14
  • [49] COMPARING TWO MEASURING METHODS OF SOIL MICROTOPOGRAPHY
    Li, Zongnan
    Chen, Zhongxin
    2012 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS), 2012, : 660 - 663
  • [50] COMPARING TWO METHODS FOR REMOVING SULFUR.
    Hucko, Richard E.
    Miller, Kenneth J.
    Coal age, 1981, 86 (06):