Verification of the efficiency of saline gargle sampling for detection of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, a pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Qiao, Kun [1 ]
Tao, Xiaoting [1 ]
Liu, Houming [2 ]
Zheng, Mingbin [3 ]
Asakawa, Tetsuya [3 ,6 ]
Lu, Hongzhou [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Dept Thorac Surg, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Clin Lab, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Inst Neurol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Dept Infect Dis, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Dept Infect Dis, 29 Buji Bulan Rd, Shenzhen 518112, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Inst Neurol, 29 Buji Bulan Rd, Shenzhen 518112, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
saline gargle; SARS-CoV-2; detection; Omicron variant; oropharyngeal swab; COVID-19; SWAB;
D O I
10.5582/bst.2022.01498
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A saline gargle (SG) has proven to be an efficient method of sampling to detect SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this pilot study was to verify the efficiency of SG sampling in detecting the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Subjects were a total of 68 patients with COVID-19 (Omicron variant), and 167 pairs of samples were collected. A conventional oropharyngeal swab (OPS) was obtained and SG sampling was performed immediately afterward; both were subjected to RT-qPCR. A subgroup analysis of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was performed. Results revealed no significant differences in the distribution of patients and cycle threshold (CT) values between the SG and OPS in overall data and data on days 1-3, 4-7, and 8-14. The subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between the SG and OPS results in symptomatic patients. In asymptomatic patients, the CT values for the SG were significantly lower than those for the OPS, implying that SG sampling had better sensitivity in the context of the Omicron variant. These data indicate that the SG had satisfactory efficiency (vs. the OPS). An SG is a simple and less invasive method of sampling that is suited to mass, frequent, and repeated sampling to detect SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 454
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Montelukast and Telmisartan as Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant
    Mulgaonkar, Nirmitee
    Wang, Haoqi
    Zhang, Junrui
    Roundy, Christopher M.
    Tang, Wendy
    Chaki, Sankar Prasad
    Pauvolid-Correa, Alex
    Hamer, Gabriel L.
    Fernando, Sandun
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [22] Importation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Beijing, China
    Li, Fu
    Liang, Zhichao
    Cui, Shujuan
    Lv, Bing
    Feng, Zhaomin
    Xu, Hui
    Jia, Lei
    Yang, Peng
    Wang, Quanyi
    Pan, Yang
    Zhang, Daitao
    BIOSAFETY AND HEALTH, 2022, 4 (03) : 150 - 153
  • [23] SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant: the black swan of microbiology
    Cheng, Zhangkai J.
    Xue, Mingshan
    Chen, Youpeng
    Zhang, Yong
    Sun, Baoqing
    ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 204 (10)
  • [24] Audio Interview: Understanding the Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2
    Rubin, Eric J.
    Baden, Lindsey R.
    Morrissey, Stephen
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (08): : E27 - E27
  • [25] Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant
    Suzuki, Rigel
    Yamasoba, Daichi
    Kimura, Izumi
    Wang, Lei
    Kishimoto, Mai
    Ito, Jumpei
    Morioka, Yuhei
    Nao, Naganori
    Nasser, Hesham
    Uriu, Keiya
    Kosugi, Yusuke
    Tsuda, Masumi
    Orba, Yasuko
    Sasaki, Michihito
    Shimizu, Ryo
    Kawabata, Ryoko
    Yoshimatsu, Kumiko
    Asakura, Hiroyuki
    Nagashima, Mami
    Sadamasu, Kenji
    Yoshimura, Kazuhisa
    Sawa, Hirofumi
    Ikeda, Terumasa
    Irie, Takashi
    Matsuno, Keita
    Tanaka, Shinya
    Fukuhara, Takasuke
    Sato, Kei
    NATURE, 2022, 603 (7902) : 700 - +
  • [26] Household transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Denmark
    Lyngse, Frederik Plesner
    Mortensen, Laust Hvas
    Denwood, Matthew J.
    Christiansen, Lasse Engbo
    Moller, Camilla Holten
    Skov, Robert Leo
    Spiess, Katja
    Fomsgaard, Anders
    Lassauniere, Ria
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Stegger, Marc
    Nielsen, Claus
    Sieber, Raphael Niklaus
    Cohen, Arieh Sierra
    Moller, Frederik Trier
    Overvad, Maria
    Molbak, Kare
    Krause, Tyra Grove
    Kirkeby, Carsten Thure
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [27] Structural Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Proteins
    Yang, Qiangzhen
    Syed, Ali Alamdar Shah
    Fahira, Aamir
    Shi, Yongyong
    RESEARCH, 2021, 2021
  • [28] Genomic Perspectives on the Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant
    Ma, Wentai
    Yang, Jing
    Fu, Haoyi
    Su, Chao
    Yu, Caixia
    Wang, Qihui
    Ribeiro de Vasconcelos, Ana Tereza
    Bazykin, Georgii A.
    Bao, Yiming
    Li, Mingkun
    GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 20 (01) : 60 - 69
  • [29] Evaluation of the cobas Liat detection test for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses following the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant
    Park, Kuenyoul
    Sung, Heungsup
    Kim, Mi-Na
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2023, 105 (04)
  • [30] Evidence for a mouse origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant
    Changshuo Wei
    Ke-Jia Shan
    Weiguang Wang
    Shuya Zhang
    Qing Huan
    Wenfeng Qian
    JournalofGeneticsandGenomics, 2021, 48 (12) : 1111 - 1121