Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles

被引:57
|
作者
Basdanis, G [1 ]
Papadopoulos, VN [1 ]
Michalopoulos, A [1 ]
Apostolidis, S [1 ]
Harlaftis, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hosp, Propedeut Surg Clin 1, Thessaloniki 55131, Greece
关键词
hemorrhoids; cricular stapler; Ligasure; piles;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-004-9098-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the results in 95 patients randomly allocated to undergo either stapled or open hemorrhoidectomy using Ligasure. Methods: Ninety-five patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either stapled (50 patients) or open using Ligasure (45 patients). Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was performed with the use of a circular stapling device. Open hemorrhoidectomy was accomplished according to the Milligan-Morgan technique by using Ligasure. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a visual analog scale (VAS). Recovery evaluation included return to pain-free defecation and normal activities. A 6-month clinical follow-up and an 18 (12-24) month median telephone follow-up were obtained in all patients. Results: Operation time for open hemorrhoidectomy using Ligasure was shorter [median 13 (range 9.2-16.1) min vs 15 (range 8-17) minutes, p < 0.05]. Median range of VAS score in the stapled group were significantly lower [VAS score after 8 h: 3 (2-6) vs 5 (3-8), p < 0.01; VAS score after first defecation: 5 (3-8) vs 7 (39), p < 0.001. The stapled hemorrhoidectomy was associated with an increased incidence of intraoperative bleeding in 18 cases (36%) vs four cases (8.8%) of the Ligasure group. There were three cases (6%) from the stapled group with recurrence of the hemorrhoids and none from the open technique. Conclusions: Hemorrhoidectomy with a circular stapler device is easy to perform, but one more line of clips must be added to the device to avoid intraoperative bleeding from the cut line. Hemorrhoidectomy performed using Ligasure is more painful postoperatively but is a more radical operation.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 239
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy:: A randomized trial
    Chung, CC
    Cheung, HYS
    Chan, ESW
    Kwok, SY
    Li, MKW
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (06) : 1213 - 1219
  • [22] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY VERSUS FERGUSON HEMORRHOIDECTOMY
    Buyukasik, Oktay
    Hasdemir, Ahmet Oguz
    Keskin, A. Ilker
    Arikan, Bilal
    Bulbul, Salih
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2008, 4 (02) : 48 - 52
  • [24] Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy - A randomized, controlled trial
    Wilson, MS
    Pope, V
    Doran, HE
    Fearn, SJ
    Brough, WA
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (11) : 1437 - 1444
  • [25] LigaSure versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    M. F. Sakr
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2010, 14 : 13 - 17
  • [26] LigaSure versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Sakr, M. F.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 14 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [27] A Randomized Trial Comparing Stapled Rectal Mucosectomy Versus Open and Semiclosed Hemorrhoidectomy
    Ripetti, Valter
    La Vaccara, Vincenzo
    Greco, Santi
    Arullani, Augusto
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (11) : 1083 - 1090
  • [28] Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
    M. Fareed
    Saleh El-Awady
    H. Abd-El monaem
    A. Aly
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2009, 13 : 243 - 246
  • [29] Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
    Fareed, M.
    El-Awady, Saleh
    Monaem, H. Abd-El
    Aly, A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2009, 13 (03) : 243 - 246
  • [30] Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure™ versus open haemorrhoidectomy
    Palazzo, FF
    Francis, DL
    Clifton, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (02) : 154 - 157