Voided urinary cytology in bladder cancer: Is it time to review the indications?

被引:44
|
作者
Talwar, Raghav [1 ]
Sinha, Tapan [1 ]
Karan, S. C. [1 ]
Doddamani, D. [1 ]
Sandhu, A. [1 ]
Sethi, G. S. [1 ]
Srivastava, A. [1 ]
Narang, V. [1 ]
Agarwal, A. [1 ]
Adhlakha, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Hosp, Dept Urol, New Delhi 110010, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The sensitivity of voided urinary cytology has been reported as very low. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity and clinical utility of voided urinary cytology in the detection of various grades and stages of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder compared with the urinary nuclear matrix protem-22 (NMP-22) qualitative assay. METHODS From March 2004 to April 2006, all patients with TCC of the bladder receiving follow-up care and those presenting with gross hematuria were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients underwent urinary cytologic examination and NMP-22 qualitative assay. The diagnosis, determined from the cystoscopy findings and biopsy findings of the suspicious lesion, was accepted as the reference standard. RESULTS A total of 196 patients were enrolled in this Study, of whoin 127 patients had previously been diagnosed with bladder TCC and 69 were presenting for investigation of gross hematuria. A total of 52 cases of bladder TCC were diagnosed. The overall sensitivity of voided urine cytology and NMP-22 assay was 21.1% and 67.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of urinary cytology and urinary NMP-22 for well-differentiated tumors was 9.5% and 52.4%, respectively, and was 18.1% and 77.3%, respectively (P < 0.001), in moderately differentiated tumors. The overall specificity of urinary cytology for TCC of the bladder was 98.6% and was greater than the specificity of NMP-22 (80.5%). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study suggest that urinary cytology has a very low sensitivity and can be omitted in favor of NMP-22 in the follow-up of low-grade superficial bladder TCC.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the NMP22 test and comparison with voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder cancer
    Lee, KH
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 42 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [32] VOIDED URINARY CYTOLOGY - COMPARISON OF CYTOLOGICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL-FINDINGS
    ZERAT, L
    FONTANIERE, B
    CLAUDE, JM
    POTET, F
    VERGES, J
    SEMAINE DES HOPITAUX, 1989, 65 (1-2): : 21 - 25
  • [33] VOIDED URINARY CYTOLOGY - COMPARISON OF CYTOLOGICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL-FINDINGS
    ZERAT, L
    FONTANIERE, B
    CLAUDE, JM
    POTET, F
    VERGES, J
    ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 1988, 22 (04) : 249 - 253
  • [34] URINARY CYTOLOGY IN ENDOMETRIOSIS OF THE BLADDER
    SCHNEIDER, V
    SMITH, MJV
    FRABLE, WJ
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1980, 24 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [35] Fluorescence cytology of the urinary bladder
    Tauber, S
    Schneede, P
    Liedl, B
    Liesmann, F
    Zaak, D
    Hofstetter, A
    UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (05) : 1067 - 1071
  • [36] URINARY CYTOLOGY OF TUBERCULOSIS OF THE BLADDER
    PISCIOLI, F
    PUSIOL, T
    POLLA, E
    FAILONI, G
    LUCIANI, L
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1985, 29 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [37] Hypermethylation of multiple genes in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients
    Chan, MWY
    Chan, LW
    Tang, NLS
    Tong, JHM
    Lo, KW
    Lee, TL
    Cheung, HY
    Wong, WS
    Chan, PSF
    Lai, FMM
    To, KF
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 8 (02) : 464 - 470
  • [38] Usefulness of the UBC (urinary bladder cancer)™ test compared to urinary cytology in patients with transitional cell bladder cancer (TCC).
    Kang, DY
    Gil, MC
    Jung, SI
    Yoon, JH
    Kim, DK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 262P - 262P
  • [39] On-the-spot test for bladder cancer superior to urinary cytology
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2005, 2 (3): : 120 - 120
  • [40] Qualitative and quantitative assessment of urinary cytokeratin 8 and 18 fragments compared with voided urine cytology in diagnosis of bladder carcinoma
    Hakenberg, OW
    Fuessel, S
    Richter, K
    Froehner, M
    Oehlschlaeger, S
    Rathert, P
    Meye, A
    Wirth, MP
    UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (06) : 1121 - 1126