Estimativa da evapotranspiracao de referencia por diferentes metodos para o setor sucroenergetico da Colombia

被引:1
|
作者
Mendoza C, Christian J. [1 ]
Pena Q, Andres J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Colombia, Agr Engn Dept, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr, Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL | 2021年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
irrigation management; Penman-Monteith FAO 56 method; mean absolute error; CENICANA;
D O I
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v25n9p583-590
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center CENICANA, efficient use of water is always performed based on estimating reference evapotranspiration. In this method, class A pans have been used to estimate the reference evapotranspiration, which provides a more precise estimate of this important variable for water resource management. The objective of this study was to evaluate different reference evapotranspiration methods for the region of influence of the climatological station of the CENICANA experimental station. The class A pan method traditionally used in CENICANA was compared with and the Penman-Monteith FAO 56 standard method. The historical series used was from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2014. The climatic variables were the maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures, the mean relative air humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed at 10 m. Willmott's coefficients, the confidence index (c), and the root mean squared error were used in the performance evaluation. In the comparison with the Penman Monteith FAO 56 method, all methods presented performance below the minimum requirement of (c) = 0.400. When all methods were compared with the method used in CENICANA (Class A pan), only the Penman-Monteith FAO 56 method showed performance classified as good (c = 0.689).
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 590
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条