Combining GIS Applications and Method of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (AHP) for Landfill Siting in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq

被引:41
|
作者
Chabuk, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [1 ]
Hussain, Hussain Musa [3 ]
Knutsson, Sven [1 ]
Pusch, Roland [1 ]
Laue, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Univ Babylon, Coll Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Babylon 51001, Iraq
[3] Univ Kufa, Fac Sci, Dept Geol, Kufa 32003, Iraq
关键词
AHP method; GIS software; landfill site; solid waste; SITE SELECTION; SUITABILITY; CITIES; TURKEY; ISLAND; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su9111932
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landfill siting is a complex process. It is one of the major problems in waste management, where many factors should be taken into consideration when selecting a suitable site for landfill in any given area. At the present time, there are many random waste disposal sites distributed throughout Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa in Iraq. In this study, the Geographic Information System (GIS) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to select the best sites for landfill. The process of selecting sites for landfill in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa comprised two steps. First, fifteen different criteria were mapped and incorporated into overlay analyses within GIS software to produce the final suitability index map for the site. The second step comprises the exclusion of unsuitable areas from the final map to simplify identification of the candidate sites for landfill in the study area. The weightings of criteria were identified using AHP, and the weightings of the sub-criteria of each criterion were determined based on multiple factors. In order to accommodate solid waste from 2020 until 2030, two suitable candidate landfill sites were determined which fulfill the required area of 1.013 km(2) with areas of 1.374 km(2) and 1.288 km(2) respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Multi-choice best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Hasan, Md Gulzarul
    Ashraf, Zubair
    Khan, Mohammad Faisal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 37 (02) : 1129 - 1156
  • [43] Multi-criteria decision-making approach with incomplete certain information based on ternary AHP
    Wang Jianqiang School of Business
    [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2006, (01) : 109 - 114
  • [44] Selection of a trigeneration system using a fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Nieto-Morote, A.
    Ruz-Vila, F.
    Canovas-Rodriguez, F. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 35 (09) : 781 - 794
  • [45] PAIRWISE JUDGMENTS CONSISTENCY IMPACT ON QUALITY OF MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-MAKING WITH AHP
    Kazibudzki, Pawel Tadeusz
    Krupka, Jiri
    [J]. E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (04): : 195 - 212
  • [46] A Novel Fuzzy Modified RAFSI Method and its Applications in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems
    Bisht, Garima
    Pal, A.K.
    [J]. Informatica (Slovenia), 2024, 48 (01): : 21 - 30
  • [47] Hesitant fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (08) : 1953 - 1967
  • [48] Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    [J]. GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2019, 9 (01) : 45 - 69
  • [49] An interactive multi-criteria decision-making method for building performance design
    Han, Zhen
    Li, Xiaoqian
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Wang, Mo
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 282
  • [50] On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making
    Beemsterboer, D. J. C.
    Hendrix, E. M. T.
    Claassen, G. D. H.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 1660 - 1665