Grounded Theory Generation: A Tool for Transparent Concept Development

被引:4
|
作者
Tucker, Todd N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Dev Studies, Cambridge, England
关键词
transparency; replication; qualitative methods; methodology; REPLICATION; IDENTITY; RECONCILIATION; CONFLICT; WORK;
D O I
10.1093/isp/ekv015
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The paradigm wars between quantitative and qualitative methodologists have focused on the validity and reliability of theory testing, with increasing concerns for transparency in both types of work. But not all research topics lend themselves to theory testing and, rather, require the generation of new theoretical concepts. The relative lack of attention to the "why" and "how" of qualitative theory generation has stunted innovation, forcing scholars to avoid such work or "reinvent the wheel" rather than build on community accomplishments. This article shows that grounded theory methods from sociology provide useful techniques for theory generation and can help scholars break through theoretical muddles. These methods have the added benefit of utilizing a workflow management that lends itself to more transparency than is common in much qualitative work. This article concludes by suggesting steps to boost transparency for grounded theory in international relations and push out the knowledge frontier.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 438
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条