Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis

被引:36
|
作者
Linde, Klaus [1 ]
Ruecker, Gerta [2 ]
Sigterman, Kirsten [1 ]
Jamil, Susanne [1 ]
Meissner, Karin [1 ,3 ]
Schneider, Antonius [1 ]
Kriston, Levente [4 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Gen Practice, D-81667 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Inst Med Biometry & Stat, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Inst Med Psychol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; INCONSISTENCY; ANXIETY; ACCEPTABILITY; INTERVENTIONS; HETEROGENEITY; COMMUNITY; EFFICACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: A variety of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorders have been developed and are used in primary care. In a systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of psychological treatments grouped by theoretical background, intensity of contact with the health care professional, and delivery mode for depressed patients in this setting. Methods: Randomized trials comparing a psychological treatment with usual care, placebo, another psychological treatment, pharmacotherapy, or a combination treatment in adult depressed primary care patients were identified by database searches up to December 2013. We performed both conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence. Outcome measures were response to treatment (primary outcome), remission of symptoms, post-treatment depression scores and study discontinuation. Results: A total of 37 studies with 7,024 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the psychological treatments investigated in at least 150 patients face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; OR 1.80; 95 % credible interval 1.35-2.39), face-to-face counselling and psychoeducation (1.65; 1.27-2.13), remote therapist lead CBT (1.87; 1.38-2.53), guided self-help CBT (1.68; 1.22-2.30) and no/minimal contact CBT (1.53; 1.07-2.17) were superior to usual care or placebo, but not face-to-face problem-solving therapy and face-to-face interpersonal therapy. There were no statistical differences between psychological treatments apart from face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy being inferior to remote therapist-lead CBT (0.60; 0.37-0.95). Remote therapist-led (0.86; 0.21-3.67), guided self-help (0.93; 0.62-1.41) and no/minimal contact CBT (0.85; 0.54-1.36) had similar effects as face-to-face CBT. Conclusions: The limited available evidence precludes a sufficiently reliable assessment of the comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments in depressed primary care patients. Findings suggest that psychological interventions with a cognitive behavioral approach are promising, and primarily indirect evidence indicates that it applies also when they are delivered with a reduced number of therapist contacts or remotely.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
    Klaus Linde
    Gerta Rücker
    Kirsten Sigterman
    Susanne Jamil
    Karin Meissner
    Antonius Schneider
    Levente Kriston
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [2] Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Linde, Klaus
    Sigterman, Kirsten
    Kriston, Levente
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Jamil, Susanne
    Meissner, Karin
    Schneider, Antonius
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 (01) : 56 - 68
  • [3] Efficacy and Acceptability of Pharmacological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Linde, Klaus
    Kriston, Levente
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Jamil, Susanne
    Schumann, Isabelle
    Meissner, Karin
    Sigterman, Kirsten
    Schneider, Antonius
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [4] Effectiveness of internet-delivered psychological treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety and/or depressive disorders: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lopez-Soler, Concepcion
    Vicente-Escudero, Jose Luis
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose Antonio
    Alcantara, Mavi
    Martinez, Antonia
    Castro, Maravillas
    Fernandez, Visitacion
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 24 (03)
  • [5] Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Munoz-Barreno, Alison
    Cabezas-Mera, Fausto
    Tejera, Eduardo
    Machado, Antonio
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (08):
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic psychological treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in adulthood
    Newby, Jill M.
    McKinnon, Anna
    Kuyken, Willem
    Gilbody, Simon
    Dalgleish, Tim
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2015, 40 : 91 - 110
  • [7] Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Postnatal Depression in Primary Care: A Meta-Analysis
    Stephens, Sian
    Ford, Elizabeth
    Paudyal, Priya
    Smith, Helen
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 14 (05) : 463 - 472
  • [8] Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
    Belavy, Daniel L.
    Diwan, Ashish D.
    Ford, Jon
    Miller, Clint T.
    Hahne, Andrew J.
    Mundell, Niamh
    Tagliaferri, Scott
    Bowe, Steven
    Pedder, Hugo
    Saueressig, Tobias
    Zhao, Xiaohui
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Balasundaram, Arun Prasad
    Arora, Nitin Kumar
    Owen, Patrick J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [9] Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Zhaolun Cai
    Yiqiong Yin
    Yuan Yin
    Chaoyong Shen
    Jian Wang
    Xiaonan Yin
    Zhixin Chen
    Ye Zhou
    Bo Zhang
    [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 1031 - 1040
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Cai, Zhaolun
    Yin, Yiqiong
    Yin, Yuan
    Shen, Chaoyong
    Wang, Jian
    Yin, Xiaonan
    Chen, Zhixin
    Zhou, Ye
    Zhang, Bo
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (06) : 1031 - 1040