Expander/Implant Removal After Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Risk Factors and Timeline

被引:31
|
作者
Ozturk, Cemile Nurdan [1 ]
Ozturk, Can [1 ]
Soucise, Allison [1 ]
Platek, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Ahsan, Nabiha [3 ]
Lohman, Robert [1 ]
Moon, Wong [1 ]
Djohan, Risal [4 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Head Neck & Plast Surg, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Buffalo State Coll, Dept Hlth Nutr & Dietet, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Tissue expander; Implant; Explantation; Infection; Breast; Removal; Prosthetic; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; TISSUE EXPANDER; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; SURGEONS; OUTCOMES; SALVAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-017-1031-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Removal of tissue expanders (TE) or implants is a dire consequence of breast reconstruction, and has the potential to halt the reconstructive efforts. Our goals were to characterize a cohort of patients with TE/implant removal, to perform a time-based analysis, and to review the bacteriology associated with explanted devices. Review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent TE/implant removal. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, adjuvant therapies, indications, complications, culture results were obtained. Data were analyzed according to timing of explantation. A total of 55 TE and implants were removed in 43 patients. Reasons for explantation were infection (58%), patient request (22%), and wound-related complications (20%). The majority of explantations occurred after 30 days (62%), and after Stage I (81%). Median days to explantation was 62. Patients of older age (p = 0.01) and higher BMI (p = 0.02) were more likely to undergo explantation after Stage I. The most commonly cultured organisms were S. epidermidis (10.9%), S. aureus (10.9%) and P. aeruginosa (10.9%). Antibiotic resistance was commonly encountered for ampicillin, cefazolin, penicillin, and erythromycin. Infection is the most common reason for explantation after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Patients should be carefully monitored for a prolonged period of time after Stage I, as the majority of explantations occur in this stage but beyond 30 days. For oral treatment, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and for IV treatment a combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenems/carbapenems appear to be appropriate choices according to our culture results. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:64 / 72
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction in the COVID Era: Which is the “Unhappy” Tissue Expander Priority?
    R. Elia
    M. Maruccia
    E. Nacchiero
    A. De Cosmo
    G. Giudice
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2021, 45 : 3090 - 3091
  • [32] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Melita, Dario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (04) : 601 - 615
  • [33] Risk factors of implant loss and complications post-implant based breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis
    Nawaf Alhindi
    Basma Bamakhrama
    Anas Alzahrani
    Hatan Mortada
    Nashwa M. Ali
    Abdullah Alruwaili
    Noor Baamir
    Hattan Aljaaly
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2023, 46 : 865 - 874
  • [34] Risk factors of implant loss and complications post-implant based breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis
    Alhindi, Nawaf
    Bamakhrama, Basma
    Alzahrani, Anas
    Mortada, Hatan
    Ali, Nashwa M.
    Alruwaili, Abdullah
    Baamir, Noor
    Aljaaly, Hattan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 46 (06) : 865 - 874
  • [35] Immediate two-stage breast reconstruction and irradiation with a tissue expander and an implant: results, risk factors for failure and self-evaluation
    Gurriet, B.
    Padovani, L.
    Tallet, A.
    Letrosne, E.
    Vaini, V.
    Boyer, A.
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Cowen, D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 106 : S237 - S237
  • [36] Outcomes of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Prereconstruction Radiation
    Hirsch, Elliot M.
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Dumanian, Gregory A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Mustoe, Thomas A.
    Galiano, Robert D.
    Fine, Neil A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) : 354 - 361
  • [37] Management of Expander- and Implant-Associated Infections in Breast Reconstruction
    Ozturk, Can
    Ozturk, Cemile N.
    Platek, Mary
    Soucise, Allison
    Laub, Peter
    Morin, Nabiha
    Lohman, Robert
    Moon, Wong
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (06) : 2075 - 2082
  • [38] Analgesia with thoracic wall nerve block for breast reconstruction with expander or implant
    Hisada, T.
    Nakada, J.
    Okumura, S.
    Kondou, N.
    Sawaki, M.
    Yoshimura, A.
    Adachi, Y.
    Ishiguro, J.
    Kotani, H.
    Iwata, H.
    BREAST, 2015, 24 : S137 - S137
  • [39] Invited Discussion on: Management of Expander and Implant Associated Infections in Breast Reconstruction
    Souto, Luis Ricardo Martinhao
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (06) : 2083 - 2088
  • [40] Radiotherapy tattoo - A landmark for an underlying expander implant port in breast reconstruction
    Mahajan, Vasundhara A.
    Mahajan, Ajay L.
    Morris, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (02): : E171 - E171