Performance of clinician prediction of survival in oncology outpatients with advanced cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Yu Jung [1 ]
Yoon, Seok Joon [2 ]
Suh, Sang-Yeon [3 ,4 ]
Hiratsuka, Yusuke [5 ,6 ]
Kang, Beodeul [7 ]
Lee, Si Won [8 ]
Ahn, Hong-Yup [9 ]
Suh, Koung Jin [1 ]
Kim, Ji-Won [1 ]
Kim, Se Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Jin Won [1 ]
Lee, Keun-Wook [1 ]
Kim, Jee Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Jong Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol,Coll Med, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Family Med, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Dongguk Univ, Dept Family Med, Ilsan Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
[4] Dongguk Univ, Dept Med, Med Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Takeda Gen Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Aizu Wakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
[6] Tohoku Univ, Dept Palliat Med, Sch Med, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[7] CHA Univ, Bundang Med Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Seongnam, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Med Oncol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Dongguk Univ, Dept Stat, Med Sch, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 04期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
TERMINAL CANCER; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0267467
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe aimed to investigate the performance of clinician prediction of survival (CPS) and the association between CPS and the prognostic confidence of clinicians in ambulatory medical oncology outpatients. MethodsEight medical oncologists estimated the expected survival of their patients in a prospective cohort study. They were asked to provide a temporal type of CPS in weeks, together with their level of confidence for each prediction (0-100%). We analyzed the accuracy of CPS, the association between CPS and the prognostic confidence, and the characteristics of patients showing inaccurate CPS. ResultsA total of 200 advanced cancer patients were enrolled and the median overall survival was 7.6 months. CPS was accurate in 67 (33.5%) patients, underestimated in 87 (43.5%), and overestimated in 46 (23.0%). The overall accuracy of CPS for 12-week, 24-week, 36-week, and 48-week survival was 83.0%, 72.0%, 75.5%, and 74.0%, respectively. The specificity was highest for 12-week survival (90.2%) and the sensitivity was highest for 48-week survival (96.1%). The sensitivity of 12-week CPS was 51.4% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.87). The prognostic confidence of clinicians was not significantly associated with the accuracy of prediction (P = 0.359). Patients with overestimated survival had significantly poorer global health status and physical/role/emotional functioning in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Additionally, they showed significantly higher levels of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, and loss of appetite. ConclusionThe overall accuracy of CPS in predicting 12-week to 48-week survival was high in medical oncology outpatients. However the sensitivity of 12-week CPS was low and prognostic confidence was not associated with the accuracy of CPS. Patients with overestimated CPS showed poorer quality of life and higher symptom burden.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genomics driven precision oncology in advanced biliary tract cancer improves survival
    Kumar-Sinha, Chandan
    Vats, Pankaj
    Tran, Nguyen
    Robinson, Dan R.
    Gunchick, Valerie
    Wu, Yi-Mi
    Cao, Xuhong
    Ning, Yu
    Wang, Rui
    Rabban, Erica
    Bell, Janice
    Shankar, Sunita
    Mannan, Rahul
    Zhang, Yuping
    Zalupski, Mark M.
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    Sahai, Vaibhav
    NEOPLASIA, 2023, 42
  • [22] Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis
    Hung-Chia Chen
    Ralph L Kodell
    Kuang Fu Cheng
    James J Chen
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12
  • [23] Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis
    Chen, Hung-Chia
    Kodell, Ralph L.
    Cheng, Kuang Fu
    Chen, James J.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [24] Fluoxetine versus placebo in advanced cancer outpatients
    Alliot, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (01) : 204 - 205
  • [25] Prognostic tools for survival prediction in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review
    Pobar, Isaiah
    Job, Mary
    Holt, Tanya
    Hargrave, Catriona
    Hickey, Brigid
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 65 (06) : 806 - 816
  • [26] The use of nuclear morphometry for the prediction of survival in patients with advanced cancer of the larynx
    W. Dobroś
    K. Gil
    Z. Chłap
    E. Olszewski
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1999, 256 : 257 - 261
  • [27] The use of nuclear morphometry for the prediction of survival in patients with advanced cancer of the larynx
    Dobros, W
    Gil, K
    Chlap, Z
    Olszewski, E
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 256 (05) : 257 - 261
  • [28] How Accurate Are Physicians in the Prediction of Patient Survival in Advanced Lung Cancer?
    Clement-Duchene, Christelle
    Carnin, Charlotte
    Guillemin, Francis
    Martinet, Yves
    ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (07): : 782 - 789
  • [29] Longitudinal Temporal and Probabilistic Prediction of Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Advanced Cancer
    Perez-Cruz, Pedro E.
    Dos Santos, Renata
    Silva, Thiago Buosi
    Crovador, Camila Souza
    de Angelis Nascimento, Maria Salete
    Hall, Stacy
    Fajardo, Julieta
    Bruera, Eduardo
    Hui, David
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 48 (05) : 875 - 882
  • [30] Multimodal survival prediction in advanced pancreatic cancer using machine learning
    Keyl, J.
    Kasper, S.
    Wiesweg, M.
    Goetze, J.
    Schoenrock, M.
    Sinn, M.
    Berger, A.
    Nasca, E.
    Kostbade, K.
    Schumacher, B.
    Markus, P.
    Albers, D.
    Treckmann, J.
    Schmid, K. W.
    Schildhaus, H-U
    Siveke, J. T.
    Schuler, M.
    Kleesiek, J.
    ESMO OPEN, 2022, 7 (05)