Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine with a Zero-P Spacer. Radiographic Results with a Minimum Follow-up of One Year in a Prospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Vanek, P. [1 ]
Bradac, O. [1 ]
Saur, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ustredni Vojenska Nemocn Praha, Neurochirurg Klin, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
cervical spine; interbody fusion; fusion rate; radiology; stand-alone implant; Zero-P; CARBON-FIBER CAGE; CLOWARD PROCEDURE; BONE; DISKECTOMY; DYSPHAGIA; FIXATION; IMPLANT; DEVICE; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical microdiscectomy and fusion carried out using a newly designed interbody spacer with that of a standard cage plate construct in patients with symptomatic cervical spine spodylosis. The comparison was based on radiographic results and fusion rates. MATERIAL A total number of 113 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study between October 2008 and July 2009. Mono- or bisegmental spondylosis was diagnosed in the patients in whom conservative treatment of cervicobrachial symptoms had had no effect. Patients with myelopathy were not included.. METHODS All patients underwent standard anterior microdiscectomy (at one or two levels). The novel anchored spacer Zero-P was used in 61 patients (group 1) and, in 52 patients, stabilisation was done using the interbody spacer Cornerstone and dynamic plate Premier (group 2). Lateral radiographic views of the cervical spine were obtained before surgery and at 6 weeks, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. During follow-up, the cervical spine sagittal alignment (CobbC), segmental angle of the treated levels (CobbS), amount of segmental collapse and fusion rates were measured. RESULTS There was no significant difference in CobbC between the two groups during follow- up (p < 0.051). A significant difference in the first two values of CobbS was found (p < 0.001), but next changes in CobbS were without any difference in either group. The mean degree of interspace collapse was without any significant difference between the groups. The fusion rate was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 nine months after surgery (p = 0.032), but was the same in both groups at 12 months after surgery (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS The anchored spacer Zero-P provides biomechanical stability for the cervical spine similar to the cage and dynamic plate construct. Efforts to improve the cervical stand-alone anterior fusion device and to eliminate disadvantages of plate systems should be studied in larger patient groups with longer follow-ups.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 567
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine With Zero-P Spacer Prospective Comparative Study-Clinical and Radiological Results at a Minimum 2 Years after Surgery
    Vanek, Petr
    Bradac, Ondrej
    DeLacy, Patricia
    Lacman, Jiri
    Benes, Vladimir
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (13) : E792 - E797
  • [2] A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results
    Hacker, RJ
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (02) : 222 - 226
  • [3] Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion
    Yuanyuan Chen
    Huajing Chen
    Peng Cao
    Wen Yuan
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 1666 - 1672
  • [4] Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Chen, Huajing
    Cao, Peng
    Yuan, Wen
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (08) : 1666 - 1672
  • [5] Risk Factors for Dysphagia after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with the Zero-P implant system: A Study with Minimum of 2 Years Follow-up
    Xue, Rong
    Ji, Zhu-yong
    Cheng, Xing-dong
    Zhang, Zhu-qiu
    Zhang, Feng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (01) : 149 - 156
  • [6] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion - A minimum 10-year follow-up
    Penta, M
    Fraser, RD
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (20) : 2429 - 2434
  • [7] Treatment of traumatic cervical spine instability with interbody fusion cages: A prospective controlled study with a 2-year follow-up
    Kandziora, F
    Pflugmacher, R
    Scholz, M
    Schnake, K
    Putzier, M
    Khodadadyan-Klostermann, C
    Haas, NP
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 : 27 - 35
  • [8] Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Ishihara, H
    Osada, R
    Kanamori, M
    Kawaguchi, Y
    Ohmori, K
    Kimura, T
    Matsui, H
    Tsuji, H
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2001, 14 (02): : 91 - 99
  • [9] Comparison of the efficacy of ROI-C cage with Zero-P device in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of cervical degenerative disc disease: a two-year follow-up study
    Wu, Penghuan
    Yang, Sifan
    Wang, Yu
    Wu, Qiang
    Zhang, Yingze
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [10] LUMBAR DISC SPACE HEIGHTS AFTER EXTERNAL FIXATION AND ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION - A PROSPECTIVE 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC RESULTS
    SOINI, J
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1994, 7 (06): : 487 - 494