The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index

被引:256
|
作者
Corneli, G
Di Somma, C
Baldelli, R
Rovere, S
Gasco, V
Croce, CG
Grottoli, S
Maccario, M
Colao, A
Lombardi, G
Ghigo, E
Camanni, F
Aimaretti, G
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab Dis, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Div Endocrinol, Naples, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1530/eje.1.01967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on a reduced peak GH response to provocative tests, such as the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the GH-releasing hormone-arginine (GHRH-ARG) test. However, the cut-off limits of peak GH response in lean subjects are not reliable in obese patients; this is noteworthy since adult GHD is often associated with obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic cut-off limits of peak GH response to the GHRH-ARG test in overweight and obese as well as in lean population. Design and methods: The GH responses to the GHRH-ARG test were studied in 322 patients with organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease and in 318 control subjects. Patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the number of pituitary hormone deficits, except for GH deficiency: (a) patients with total pituitary hormone deficit (TPHD) and (b) patients without or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (PHD). Both patients and control subjects were divided into three subgroups according to body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI < 25kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI >= 25 and < 30kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)). TPHD patients were assumed to be GH deficient, whereas PHD patients may include subjects with either normal or impaired GH secretion. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis (Medcale 7.2). The diagnostic cut-off points were calculated for lean, overweight and obese subjects to provide optimal separation of GH-deficient patients and control subjects according to two criteria: (1) a balance between high sensitivity and high specificity; (2) to provide the highest pair of sensitivity/specificity values for GH deficiency. Results: In the lean population the best pair of values, with highest sensitivity as 98.7% and highest specificity as 83.7%, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 11.5 mu g/l. In the overweight population the best pair of values, 96.7 and 75.5%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 8.0 mu g/l. In the obese population the best pair of values, 93.5 and 78.3%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 4.2 mu g/l. Applying the above mentioned cut-off points, among PHD patients we found that 80 subjects (72%) were GHD whereas 31 (28%) had normal GH secretion. Conclusions: In conclusion the GHRH-ARG test is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in lean, overweight and obese patients, provided that specific BMI-related cut-off limits are assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF THE POTENTIATION OF CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY ON THE VARIABILITY IN INDIVIDUAL GH RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING HORMONE
    MAZZA, E
    GHIGO, E
    GOFFI, S
    PROCOPIO, M
    IMPERIALE, E
    ARVAT, E
    BELLONE, J
    BOGHEN, MF
    MULLER, EE
    CAMANNI, F
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 1989, 12 (11) : 795 - 798
  • [32] A Reappraisal of the Cut-off Limits of the Peak GH Response to Stimulation Tests for the Diagnosis of GH Deficiency in Children and Adolescents
    Guzzetti, Chiara
    Ibba, Anastasia
    Pilia, Sabrina
    Beltrami, Nadia
    Di Iorgi, Natascia
    Rollo, Alessandra
    Radetti, Giorgio
    Zucchini, Stefano
    Maghnie, Mohamad
    Cappa, Marco
    Loche, Sandro
    ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2014, 35 (03)
  • [33] Hypothalamic derangement in traumatized patients: growth hormone (GH) and prolactin response to thyrotrophin-releasing hormone and GH-releasing hormone
    De Marinis, L
    Mancini, A
    Valle, D
    Bianchi, A
    Gentilella, R
    Liberale, I
    Mignani, V
    Pennisi, M
    Della Corte, F
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 50 (06) : 741 - 747
  • [34] THE GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING PEPTIDE (HIS-DTRP-ALA-TRP-DPHE-LYS-NH2), GH-RELEASING HORMONE, AND THYROTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE IN ACROMEGALY
    ALSTER, DK
    BOWERS, CY
    JAFFE, CA
    HO, PJ
    BARKAN, AL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1993, 77 (03): : 842 - 845
  • [35] BETA-ENDORPHIN (BE) - A MODULATOR OF THE GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING HORMONE (GHRH)
    ABDENUR, J
    PUGLIESE, M
    LIFSHITZ, F
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1990, 27 (04) : A70 - A70
  • [36] EFFECTS OF METHIMAZOLE TREATMENT ON GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING HORMONE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTHYROIDISM
    GIUSTINA, A
    FERRARI, C
    BODINI, C
    BUFFOLI, MG
    LEGATI, F
    SCHETTINO, M
    ZUCCATO, F
    WEHRENBERG, WB
    ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 1990, 123 (06): : 613 - 618
  • [37] BLUNTED GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING HORMONE IN HYPOTHYROIDISM RESOLVES IN THE EUTHYROID STATE
    WILLIAMS, T
    MAXON, H
    THORNER, MO
    FROHMAN, LA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1985, 61 (03): : 454 - 456
  • [38] ACUTE EFFECT OF PROPRANOLOL ON THE GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSE TO GH-RELEASING HORMONE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTHYROIDISM
    GIUSTINAL, A
    BUFFOLI, MG
    FERRARI, C
    GAZZOLI, N
    PIZZOCOLO, G
    TASSI, C
    WEHRENBERG, WB
    HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 1991, 23 (10) : 506 - 508
  • [39] Relationship between the morphological evaluation of the pituitary and the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone plus arginine in children and adults with congenital hypopituitarism
    Maghnie, M
    Salati, B
    Bianchi, S
    Rallo, M
    Tinelli, C
    Autelli, M
    Aimaretti, G
    Ghigo, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (04): : 1574 - 1579
  • [40] GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RESPONSIVENESS TO COMBINED ADMINISTRATION OF ARGININE AND GH-RELEASING HORMONE DOES NOT VARY WITH AGE IN MAN
    GHIGO, E
    GOFFI, S
    NICOLOSI, M
    ARVAT, E
    VALENTE, F
    MAZZA, E
    GHIGO, MC
    CAMANNI, F
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1990, 71 (06): : 1481 - 1485