Mate choice, mate preference, and biological markets: the relationship between partner choice and health preference is modulated by women's own attractiveness

被引:19
|
作者
Wincenciak, Joanna [1 ]
Fincher, Corey L. [2 ]
Fisher, Claire I. [1 ]
Hahn, Amanda C. [1 ]
Jones, Benedict C. [1 ]
DeBruine, Lisa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Neurosci & Psychol, Glasgow G12 8QB, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
Mate choice; Mate preferences; Facial attractiveness; Health; Biological markets; ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE; EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY; FACIAL MASCULINITY; APPARENT HEALTH; FACES; PERCEPTIONS; ADAPTATION; PREDICTS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although much of the research on human mate preference assumes that mate preference and partner choice will be related to some extent evidence for correlations between mate preference and mate choice is mixed. Inspired by biological market theories of mate choice, which propose that individuals with greater market value will be better placed to translate their preference into choice, we investigated whether participants' own attractiveness modulated the relationship between their preference and choice. Multilevel modeling showed that experimentally assessed preferences for healthy-looking other-sex faces predicted third-party ratings of partner's facial health better among women whose faces were rated as more attractive by third parties. This pattern of results was not seen for men. These results suggest that the relationship between mate preference and mate choice may be more complex than was assumed in previous research, at least among women. Our results also highlight the utility of biological market theories for understanding the links between mate preference and partner choice. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 278
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mate choice copying versus preference for actively displaying males by female pied flycatchers
    Slagsvold, T
    Viljugrein, H
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 57 : 679 - 686
  • [42] Trichromatic vision in toads: evidence from preference for colour objects during mate choice
    Kondrashev, Sergei L.
    BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 160 (8-9) : 753 - 784
  • [43] Identifying context-specific gene profiles of social, reproductive, and mate preference behavior in a fish species with female mate choice
    Ramsey, Mary E.
    Maginnis, Tara L.
    Wong, Ryan Y.
    Brock, Chad
    Cummings, Molly E.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [44] Evidence of adaptation for mate choice within women's memory
    Allan, Kevin
    Jones, Benedict C.
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    Smith, David S.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 33 (03) : 193 - 199
  • [45] Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior
    Yang, Yusan
    Blomenkamp, Simone
    Dugas, Matthew B.
    Richards-Zawacki, Corinne L.
    Proehl, Heike
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 193 (04): : 598 - 607
  • [46] Role of emotional and social intelligence in women's mate choice
    Ortiz-Rodriguez, Gregorio
    Gutierrez, German
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 610 - 610
  • [47] Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference
    Dechaume-Moncharmont, Francois-Xavier
    Freychet, Marine
    Motreuil, Sebastien
    Cezilly, Frank
    FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY, 2013, 10
  • [48] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSITIVE PREFERENCE AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHOICE SPACE
    SONNENSCHEIN, H
    ECONOMETRICA, 1965, 33 (03) : 624 - 634
  • [49] Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference
    François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont
    Marine Freychet
    Sébastien Motreuil
    Frank Cézilly
    Frontiers in Zoology, 10
  • [50] Preference for older over younger models during mate-choice copying in young guppies
    Amlacher, J
    Dugatkin, LA
    ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 17 (02) : 161 - 169