Land Use Land Cover Classification with U-Net: Advantages of Combining Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery

被引:67
|
作者
Solorzano, Jonathan V. [1 ]
Mas, Jean Francois [2 ]
Gao, Yan [2 ]
Gallardo-Cruz, Jose Alberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Geografia Ambiental, Posgrad Geografia, Antigua Carretera Patzcuaro 8701,Col Ex Hacienda, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Geografia Ambiental, Lab Analisis Espacial, Antigua Carretera Patzcuaro 8701,Col Ex Hacienda, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[3] Univ Iberoamericana Ciudad Mexico, Ctr Transdisciplinar Univ Sustentabilidad, Prolongac Paseo Reforma 880,Lomas Santa Fe, Ciudad De Mexico 01219, Mexico
关键词
deep learning; multispectral and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery; convolutional neural networks; tropical landscape mosaic; LULC mapping; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FOREST;
D O I
10.3390/rs13183600
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The U-net is nowadays among the most popular deep learning algorithms for land use/land cover (LULC) mapping; nevertheless, it has rarely been used with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and multispectral (MS) imagery. On the other hand, the discrimination between plantations and forests in LULC maps has been emphasized, especially for tropical areas, due to their differences in biodiversity and ecosystem services provision. In this study, we trained a U-net using different imagery inputs from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellites, MS, SAR and a combination of both (MS + SAR); while a random forests algorithm (RF) with the MS + SAR input was also trained to evaluate the difference in algorithm selection. The classification system included ten classes, including old-growth and secondary forests, as well as old-growth and young plantations. The most accurate results were obtained with the MS + SAR U-net, where the highest overall accuracy (0.76) and average F1-score (0.58) were achieved. Although MS + SAR and MS U-nets gave similar results for almost all of the classes, for old-growth plantations and secondary forest, the addition of the SAR band caused an F1-score increment of 0.08-0.11 (0.62 vs. 0.54 and 0.45 vs. 0.34, respectively). Consecutively, in comparison with the MS + SAR RF, the MS + SAR U-net obtained higher F1-scores for almost all the classes. Our results show that using the U-net with a combined input of SAR and MS images enabled a higher F1-score and accuracy for a detailed LULC map, in comparison with other evaluated methods.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automated Production of a Land Cover/Use Map of Europe Based on Sentinel-2 Imagery
    Malinowski, Radek
    Lewinski, Stanislaw
    Rybicki, Marcin
    Gromny, Ewa
    Jenerowicz, Malgorzata
    Krupinski, Michal
    Nowakowski, Artur
    Wojtkowski, Cezary
    Krupinski, Marcin
    Kraetzschmar, Elke
    Schauer, Peter
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 27
  • [22] LAND COVER SEGMENTATION WITH SPARSE ANNOTATIONS FROM SENTINEL-2 IMAGERY
    Galatola, Marco
    Arnaudo, Edoardo
    Barco, Luca
    Rossi, Claudio
    Dominici, Fabrizio
    [J]. IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 6952 - 6955
  • [23] INVESTIGATIONS ON THE POTENTIAL OF HYPERSPECTRAL AND SENTINEL-2 DATA FOR LAND-COVER / LAND-USE CLASSIFICATION
    Weinmann, M.
    Maier, P. M.
    Florath, J.
    Weidner, U.
    [J]. ISPRS TC I MID-TERM SYMPOSIUM INNOVATIVE SENSING - FROM SENSORS TO METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 4-1 : 155 - 162
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF LAND COVER AND LAND USE CHANGES USING SENTINEL-2 IMAGES
    Iurist , Nicoleta
    Statescu, Florian
    Lates, Iustina
    [J]. PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 10 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [25] Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery for Urban Land Cover Classification by Optimized Random Forest Classifier
    Zhang, Tianxiang
    Su, Jinya
    Xu, Zhiyong
    Luo, Yulin
    Li, Jiangyun
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 17
  • [26] Image Classification and Land Cover Mapping Using Sentinel-2 Imagery: Optimization of SVM Parameters
    Yousefi, Saleh
    Mirzaee, Somayeh
    Almohamad, Hussein
    Al Dughairi, Ahmed Abdullah
    Gomez, Christopher
    Siamian, Narges
    Alrasheedi, Mona
    Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [27] THE MULTI-TEMPORAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SENTINEL-1 SAR FEATURES AND SENTINEL-2 NDVI FOR DIFFERENT LAND USE / LAND COVER CLASSES IN CENTRAL AFRICA
    Rucinski, Marek
    Foks-Ryznar, Anna
    Mayos, Lluis Pesquer
    Wozniak, Edyta
    Domingo-Marimon, Cristina
    Jenerowicz-Sanikowska, Malgorzata
    Krupinski, Michal
    Gromny, Ewa
    Aleksandrowicz, Sebastian
    [J]. IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 325 - 328
  • [28] Sentinel-2 Data for Land Cover/Use Mapping: A Review
    Phiri, Darius
    Simwanda, Matamyo
    Salekin, Serajis
    Nyirenda, Vincent R.
    Murayama, Yuji
    Ranagalage, Manjula
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [29] Assessing the use of cross-orbit Sentinel-1 images in land cover classification
    Sayedain, Seyed Ali
    Maghsoudi, Yasser
    Eini-Zinab, Sajjad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 41 (20) : 7801 - 7819
  • [30] Effect of the Synergetic Use of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, LiDAR and Derived Data in Land Cover Classification of a Semiarid Mediterranean Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Valdivieso-Ros, Carmen
    Alonso-Sarria, Francisco
    Gomariz-Castillo, Francisco
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (02)