Avian influenza A virus susceptibility, infection, transmission, and antibody kinetics in European starlings

被引:13
|
作者
Ellis, Jeremy W. L. [1 ]
Root, J. Jeffrey A. [1 ]
McCurdy, Loredana M. [1 ]
Bentler, Kevin T. R. [1 ]
Barrett, Nicole L. [1 ]
VanDalen, Kaci K. R. [1 ,2 ]
Dirsmith, Katherine L. [1 ,3 ]
Shriner, Susan A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Anim Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Wildlife Serv, USDA, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[2] NIAID, NIH, Off Biodefense Res & Surety, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Anim Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, Field Operat Dist Vet Serv 1, USDA, San Juan, PR USA
关键词
PASSERINE BIRDS; WILD BIRDS; STURNUS-VULGARIS; UNITED-STATES; TURKEY FARMS; PATHOGENICITY; OUTBREAK; POULTRY; ASSAY; H5N1;
D O I
10.1371/journal.ppat.1009879
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Avian influenza A viruses (IAVs) pose risks to public, agricultural, and wildlife health. Bridge hosts are spillover hosts that share habitat with both maintenance hosts (e.g., mallards) and target hosts (e.g., poultry). We conducted a comprehensive assessment of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), a common visitor to both urban and agricultural environments, to assess whether this species might act as a potential maintenance or bridge host for IAVs. First, we experimentally inoculated starlings with a wild bird IAV to investigate susceptibility and replication kinetics. Next, we evaluated whether IAV might spill over to starlings from sharing resources with a widespread IAV reservoir host. We accomplished this using a specially designed transmission cage to simulate natural environmental transmission by exposing starlings to water shared with IAV-infected mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). We then conducted a contact study to assess intraspecies transmission between starlings. In the initial experimental infection study, all inoculated starlings shed viral RNA and seroconverted. All starlings in the transmission study became infected and shed RNA at similar levels. All but one of these birds seroconverted, but detectable antibodies were relatively transient, falling to negative levels in a majority of birds by 59 days post contact. None of the contact starlings in the intraspecies transmission experiment became infected. In summary, we demonstrated that starlings may have the potential to act as IAV bridge hosts if they share water with IAV-infected waterfowl. However, starlings are unlikely to act as maintenance hosts due to limited, if any, intraspecies transmission. In addition, starlings have a relatively brief antibody response which should be considered when interpreting serology from field samples. Further study is needed to evaluate the potential for transmission from starlings to poultry, a possibility enhanced by starling's behavioral trait of forming very large flocks which can descend on poultry facilities when natural resources are scarce. Author summary Besides causing seasonal influenza, influenza A viruses (IAVs) are important because they can become pathogenic and threaten human, livestock, or wildlife health. Wild birds are the primary reservoir of IAVs which are generally low pathogenic, but when wild bird viruses spill over into poultry, they can evolve to be highly pathogenic to poultry and sometimes to wild birds or humans. Thus, understanding how viruses move from wild birds into poultry is important. Aquatic birds such as ducks and geese are commonly infected with IAVs, but in many regions, these birds are uncommon on farms. Therefore, species that use both aquatic and agricultural areas may pose a risk by moving IAVs from aquatic birds to poultry. In this paper we evaluated whether European starlings, a species commonly found in both aquatic and agricultural habitats, can be infected by sharing water with IAV-infected ducks. We found that starlings can become infected when exposed to contaminated water, but IAV does not readily transmit between starlings. Consequently, starlings may pose a risk for spillover of IAVs to farms but are unlikely to maintain infections without exposure to other species.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] A unique feature of swine ANP32A provides susceptibility to avian influenza virus infection in pigs
    Zhang, Haili
    Li, Hongxin
    Wang, Wenqiang
    Wang, Yujie
    Han, Guan-Zhu
    Chen, Hualan
    Wang, Xiaojun
    PLOS PATHOGENS, 2020, 16 (02)
  • [33] Detection of an Antibody to Avian Influenza Virus by an Electrochemical Immunoassay (eELISA)
    Keiichi Ohtsuka
    Hiroshi Endo
    Kimio Morimoto
    Bui N. Vuong
    Haruko Ogawa
    Kunitoshi Imai
    Shigeori Takenaka
    Analytical Sciences, 2008, 24 : 1619 - 1622
  • [34] Detection of an Antibody to Avian Influenza Virus by an Electrochemical Immunoassay (eELISA)
    Ohtsuka, Keiichi
    Endo, Hiroshi
    Morimoto, Kimio
    Vuong, Bui N.
    Ogawa, Haruko
    Imai, Kunitoshi
    Takenaka, Shigeori
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 24 (12) : 1619 - 1622
  • [35] The role of the antibody response in influenza virus infection
    Gerhard, W
    ANTIBODIES IN VIRAL INFECTION, 2001, 260 : 171 - 190
  • [36] ATTEMPTED EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION OF PSEUDORABIES VIRUS TO EUROPEAN STARLINGS (STURNUS-VULGARIS)
    SCHNEIDER, WJ
    HASLETT, TM
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1978, 14 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [37] AIRBORNE TRANSMISSION OF INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTION IN MICE
    SCHULMAN, JL
    KILBOURNE, ED
    NATURE, 1962, 195 (4846) : 1129 - +
  • [38] Role of contact and genetic transmission of endogenous virus-21 in the susceptibility of chickens to avian leukosis virus infection and tumors
    Fadly, AM
    Smith, EJ
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1997, 76 (07) : 968 - 973
  • [39] Influenza A Virus in Pigs in Senegal and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) Emergence and Transmission to Human
    Jallow, Mamadou Malado
    Barry, Mamadou Aliou
    Fall, Amary
    Ndiaye, Ndiende Koba
    Kiori, Davy
    Sy, Sara
    Goudiaby, Deborah
    Niang, Mbayame Ndiaye
    Fall, Gamou
    Fall, Malick
    Dia, Ndongo
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [40] Some veterinarians at increased risk of avian influenza virus infection
    不详
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 231 (02): : 189 - 190