BANDING VS. QUALITY: PERCEPTUAL IMPACT AND OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT

被引:5
|
作者
Krasula, Lukas [1 ]
Li, Zhi [1 ]
Bampis, Christos G. [1 ]
Afonso, Mariana [1 ]
Miret, Nil Fons [1 ]
Sole, Joel [1 ]
机构
[1] Netflix Inc, Los Gatos, CA 95032 USA
关键词
Banding; Video Compression; Objective Video Quality Metrics; VMAF; CAMBI;
D O I
10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9898041
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Staircase-like contours introduced to a video by quantization in flat areas, commonly known as banding, have been a long-standing problem in both video processing and quality assessment communities. The fact that even a relatively small change of the original pixel values can result in a strong impact on perceived quality makes banding especially difficult to be detected by objective quality metrics. In this paper, we study how banding annoyance compares to more commonly studied scaling and compression artifacts with respect to the overall perceptual quality. We further propose a simple combination of VMAF and the recently developed banding index, CAMBI, into a banding-aware video quality metric showing improved correlation with overall perceived quality.
引用
收藏
页码:2236 / 2240
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF FRAME RATE ON VIDEO QUALITY
    Ukhanova, Anna
    Korhonen, Jari
    Forchhammer, Soren
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2012), 2012, : 1513 - 1516
  • [22] JPEG vs. JPEG2000: An objective comparison of image encoding quality
    Ebrahimi, F
    Chamik, M
    Winkler, S
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XXVII, PTS 1AND 2, 2004, 5558 : 300 - 308
  • [23] Perceptual quality and objective quality measurements of compressed videos
    Ong, Ee Ping
    Yang, Xiaokang
    Lin, Weisi
    Lu, Zhongkang
    Yao, Susu
    Lin, Xiao
    Rahardja, Susanto
    Seng, Boon Choong
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2006, 17 (04) : 717 - 737
  • [24] Functional recovery following hip and knee arthroplasty: subjective vs. objective assessment?
    Wainwright, Thomas W.
    Kehlet, Henrik
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 739 - 741
  • [25] PERSONAL ASSESSMENT OF ABILITY TO DRIVE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL VS. OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT
    Bashor, Blake
    Hay, Kelly
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    Stankewicz, Holly
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 61 (01): : 55 - 60
  • [26] Air Quality Impact Assessment of a Waste-to-Energy Plant: Modelling Results vs. Monitored Data
    Lonati, Giovanni
    Cernuschi, Stefano
    Giani, Paolo
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [27] DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PATIENT VS. PROVIDER ASSESSMENT OF ERECTION QUALITY
    Lee, Matthew S.
    Sax-Bolder, Anessa N.
    Kohler, Tobias S.
    Helo, Sevann
    Ziegelmann, Matthew J.
    Yang, David Y.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E705 - E705
  • [28] Impact of subjective vs. objective remission status on subjective cognitive impairments in depression
    Sawada, Kyosuke
    Yoshida, Kazunari
    Ozawa, Chisa
    Mizuno, Yuya
    Rubinstein, Ellen B.
    Suzuki, Takefumi
    Mimura, Masaru
    Uchida, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 246 : 99 - 104
  • [29] AOT vs. JIT: Impact of profile data on code quality
    Wade, April W.
    Kulkarni, Prasad A.
    Jantz, Michael R.
    Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES), 2017, Part F128681 : 1 - 10
  • [30] Impact on quality of life in patient with eczema vs. patient with psoriasis
    Korbi, M.
    Boussofara, L.
    Maoua, M.
    Kalboussi, H.
    Aroui, H.
    Aounallah, A.
    Ghariani, N.
    Denguezli, M.
    Mrizek, N.
    Belajouza, C.
    Nouira, R.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2013, 27 : 58 - 58