The Algebra of the General Markov Model on Phylogenetic Trees and Networks

被引:12
|
作者
Sumner, J. G. [1 ]
Holland, B. R. [1 ]
Jarvis, P. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Math & Phys, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Split system; Cluster system; Markov process; Maximum likelihood; INVARIANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11538-011-9691-z
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It is known that the Kimura 3ST model of sequence evolution on phylogenetic trees can be extended quite naturally to arbitrary split systems. However, this extension relies heavily on mathematical peculiarities of the associated Hadamard transformation, and providing an analogous augmentation of the general Markov model has thus far been elusive. In this paper, we rectify this shortcoming by showing how to extend the general Markov model on trees to include incompatible edges; and even further to more general network models. This is achieved by exploring the algebra of the generators of the continuous-time Markov chain together with the "splitting" operator that generates the branching process on phylogenetic trees. For simplicity, we proceed by discussing the two state case and then show that our results are easily extended to more states with little complication. Intriguingly, upon restriction of the two state general Markov model to the parameter space of the binary symmetric model, our extension is indistinguishable from the Hadamard approach only on trees; as soon as any incompatible splits are introduced the two approaches give rise to differing probability distributions with disparate structure. Through exploration of a simple example, we give an argument that our extension to more general networks has desirable properties that the previous approaches do not share. In particular, our construction allows for convergent evolution of previously divergent lineages; a property that is of significant interest for biological applications.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 880
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Counting general phylogenetic networks
    Mansouri, Marefatollah
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS, 2022, 83 : 40 - 86
  • [22] Phylogenetic networks: Properties and relationship to trees and clusters
    Nakhleh, L
    Wang, LS
    TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS BIOLOGY II, 2005, 3680 : 82 - 99
  • [23] Algorithms for Reticulate Networks of Multiple Phylogenetic Trees
    Chen, Zhi-Zhong
    Wang, Lusheng
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 9 (02) : 372 - 384
  • [24] Rooting Gene Trees via Phylogenetic Networks
    Tiuryn, Jerzy
    Rutecka, Natalia
    Gorecki, Pawel
    COMPUTING AND COMBINATORICS, COCOON 2022, 2022, 13595 : 419 - 431
  • [25] Navigating transmission networks with genomics and phylogenetic trees
    Gardy, Jennifer L.
    Brunham, Robert C.
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2010, 5 (03) : 251 - 253
  • [26] Embedding phylogenetic trees in networks of low treewidth
    van Iersel, Leo
    Jones, Mark
    Weller, Mathias
    DISCRETE MATHEMATICS AND THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 25 (02):
  • [27] Displaying trees across two phylogenetic networks
    Doecker, Janosch
    Linz, Simone
    Semple, Charles
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2019, 796 : 129 - 146
  • [28] Complex Ecological Phenotypes on Phylogenetic Trees: A Markov Process Model for Comparative Analysis of Multivariate Count Data
    Grundler, Michael
    Rabosky, Daniel L.
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2020, 69 (06) : 1200 - 1211
  • [29] Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees
    Larget, B
    Simon, DL
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 16 (06) : 750 - 759
  • [30] Evolutionary trees can be learned in polynomial time in the two-state general Markov model
    Cryan, M
    Goldberg, LA
    Goldberg, PW
    39TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 436 - 445