Analgesia for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling

被引:9
|
作者
Mujezinovic, Faris [2 ]
Alfirevic, Zarko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Liverpool Womens NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Clin Ctr, Univ Clin Dept Gynecol & Perinatol, Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
LIDOCAINE-PRILOCAINE CREAM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; REDUCE PAIN; EFFICACY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD008580.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Besides risks of miscarriage, pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are also concerned about pain associated with these procedures. Currently, approaches to analgesia can be categorised in two broad categories - non-pharmacological and pharmacological agents. Objectives To evaluate whether different methods of analgesia have any impact on pain reduction during amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2011). Selection criteria All randomised trials comparing different method of analgesia for amniocentesis or CVS. We also include trials with quasi-randomised designs, but analyse and report their results separately. Data collection and analysis Both review authors assessed eligibility and trial quality and performed data extraction. Main results We included a total of five randomised studies (involving 805 women) evaluating different methods of analgesia for amniocentesis; there were no studies in women undergoing CVS. One RCT (N = 203) and one quasi-randomised study (N = 220) compared infiltrative local anaesthesia with no anaesthesia and found no statistical difference in experienced pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) (mean differences (MD) -2.50 and 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.98 to 1.98 and -2.67 to 5.07). One study (N = 200) compared light leg rubbing versus no intervention during amniocentesis and found no change in experienced anxiety (MD 0.2; 95% CI -0.63 to 1.03) or VAS pain score (MD 0.3; 95% CI -0.35 to 0.95) during amniocentesis. Another study with 62 patients did not find any benefit of using subfreezing temperature needle during amniocentesis in terms of decreased VAS pain score (MD -0.8; 95% CI -1.8 to 0.2). In addition, there was no difference between anticipated and actual pain (MD 0.4; 95% CI -0.82 to 1.62) (before/after comparison). There was also no difference in VAS pain scores in the study with 120 participants comparing lidocaine-prilocaine analgesic cream to placebo cream before amniocentesis (MD -0.6; 95% CI -1.44 to 0.24). Authors' conclusions In general, women who undergo amniocentesis could be informed that pain during procedure is minor and that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of local anaesthetics, leg rubbing or subfreezing the needle for pain reduction during procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk for placental abruption following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
    Minna, Tikkanen
    Mika, Gissler
    Tiina, Luukkaala
    Marjo, Metsaranta
    Sture, Andersson
    Olavi, Ylikorkala
    Annukka, Ritvanen
    Vilho, Hiilesmaa
    Jorma, Paavonen
    Mika, Nuutila
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (04) : 410 - 412
  • [33] ANXIETY REDUCTION AFTER CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS
    ROBINSON, GE
    GARNER, DM
    OLMSTED, MP
    SHIME, J
    HUTTON, EM
    CRAWFORD, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 159 (04) : 953 - 956
  • [34] Fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in Iceland
    Haraldsdottir, Kristin Rut
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    Geirsson, Reynir Tomas
    [J]. LAEKNABLADID, 2014, 100 (03): : 147 - 151
  • [35] CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING FOLLOWED BY GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK
    MUGGAH, HF
    DALTON, ME
    HUNTER, AGW
    [J]. LANCET, 1987, 1 (8537): : 867 - 868
  • [36] Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: what are the risks in current practice?
    Papp, C
    Papp, Z
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [37] DETECTION OF CONGENITAL TOXOPLASMOSIS BY CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND EARLY AMNIOCENTESIS
    FOULON, W
    NAESSENS, A
    DECATTE, L
    AMY, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (05) : 1511 - 1513
  • [38] Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
    Niederstrasser, Svenja Laura
    Hammer, Kerstin
    Moellers, Mareike
    Falkenberg, Maria Karina
    Schmidt, Rene
    Steinhard, Johannes
    Klockenbusch, Walter
    Schmitz, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02) : 193 - 198
  • [39] COMPARISON OF FIRST-TRIMESTER TRANSVAGINAL AMNIOCENTESIS WITH CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND MIDTRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS
    SHALEV, E
    WEINER, E
    YANAI, N
    SHNEUR, Y
    COHEN, H
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 14 (04) : 279 - 283
  • [40] Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?
    Simonazzi, Giuliana
    Curti, Alessandra
    Farina, Antonio
    Pilu, Gianluigi
    Bovicelli, Luciano
    Rizzo, Nicola
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (04) : 365.e1 - 365.e5