Treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Comparison of extracorporeal shock waves with core decompression and bone-grafting

被引:179
|
作者
Wang, CJ
Wang, FS
Huang, CC
Yang, KD
Weng, LH
Huang, HY
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Dept Med Res, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.E.00174
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is continuing controversy regarding the optimal treatment for patients with symptomatic early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. We compared the results of noninvasive treatment with extracorporeal shock waves with those of core decompression and bone-grafting in similar groups of patients. Methods: Patients with staged-I, II, or III osteonecrosis were randomly assigned to be treated either with shock waves or with core decompression and nonvascularized fibular grafting. The shock-wave group consisted of twenty-three patients (twenty-nine hips), and the surgical group consisted of twenty-five patients (twenty-eight hips). The patients in the two groups had similar demographic characteristics, duration and stage of disease, and duration of follow-up. The patients in the shock-wave group received a single treatment with 6000 impulses of shock waves at 28 kV to the affected hip. The evaluation parameters included clinical assessment of pain with a visual analog pain scale, Harris hip scores, and an assessment of activities of daily living and work capacity. Radiographic assessment was performed with serial plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Before treatment, the two groups had similar pain and Harris hip scores. At an average of twenty-five months after treatment, the pain and Harris hip scores in the shock-wave group were significantly improved compared with the pretreatment scores (p < 0.001). In this group, 79% of the hips were improved, 10% were unchanged, and 10% were worse. Of the hips treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft, 29% were improved, 36% were unchanged, and 36% were worse. In the shock-wave group, imaging studies showed regression of five of the thirteen lesions that had been designated as stage I or II before treatment and no regression of a stage-III lesion. Two stage-II and two stage-III lesions progressed. In the surgical group, four lesions regressed and fifteen (of the nineteen graded as stage I or II) progressed. The remaining nine lesions were unchanged. Conclusions: Extracorporeal shock-wave treatment appeared to be more effective than core decompression and nonvascularized fibular grafting in patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Long-term results are needed to determine whether the effect of this novel method of treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head endures.
引用
收藏
页码:2380 / 2387
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with core decompression and bone grafting
    Wei, Biao Fang
    Ge, Xiang Hua
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 21 (02) : 206 - 210
  • [2] MRI APPEARANCE OF FEMORAL-HEAD OSTEONECROSIS FOLLOWING CORE DECOMPRESSION AND BONE-GRAFTING
    CHAN, TW
    DALINKA, MK
    STEINBERG, ME
    KRESSEL, HY
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1991, 20 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [3] Core decompression with bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head
    Steinberg, ME
    Larcom, PC
    Strafford, B
    Hosick, WB
    Corces, A
    Bands, RE
    Hartman, KE
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (386) : 71 - 78
  • [4] MECHANICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CORE DRILLING AND BONE-GRAFTING ON OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL-HEAD
    BROWN, TD
    PEDERSEN, DR
    BAKER, KJ
    BRAND, RA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09): : 1358 - 1367
  • [5] Osteonecrosis of femoral head: Treatment by core decompression and vascular pedicle grafting
    Babhulkar, Sudhir
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 43 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [6] Core Decompression and Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate Grafting for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
    Hoogervorst, Paul
    Campbell, Joshua C.
    Scholz, Natalie
    Cheng, Edward Y.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 104 (SUPPL 2): : 54 - 60
  • [7] Vascularized fibular grafting compared with core decompression in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis
    Kane, SM
    Ward, WA
    Jordan, LC
    Guilford, WB
    Hanley, EN
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 19 (10) : 869 - 872
  • [8] Multi-directional core decompression apparatus with impaction bone grafting for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis
    Cao, Pengkai
    Cai, Sijia
    Dai, Chengliang
    Liu, Chang
    Niu, Yingzhen
    Wang, Xiaomeng
    Luo, Xintong
    Wang, Fei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 10847 - 10855
  • [9] Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
    Woerner, Michael
    Voelkl, Korbinian
    Bliemel, Christopher
    Ferner, Felix
    Weber, Markus
    Renkawitz, Tobias
    Grifka, Joachim
    Craiovan, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (08)
  • [10] TREATMENT OF OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL-HEAD BY DRILLING AND MUSCLE-PEDICLE BONE-GRAFTING
    BAKSI, DP
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02): : 241 - 245