Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study

被引:7
|
作者
Pascu, Ionut-Silviu [1 ,2 ]
Dobre, Alexandru-Claudiu [1 ,2 ]
Badea, Ovidiu [1 ,2 ]
Tanase, Mihai Andrei [3 ]
机构
[1] Marin Dracea Romanian Natl Inst Res & Dev Forestr, Dept Forest Monitoring, 128 Eroilor Blvd, Voluntari 077190, Ilfov, Romania
[2] Transilvania Univ, Fac Silviculture & Forest Engn, Dept Forest Engn Forest Management Planning & Ter, 1 Ludwig Beethoven Str, Brasov 500123, Romania
[3] Univ Alcala, Dept Geol Geog & Environm, 2 C Colegios, Alcala De Henares 28801, Spain
来源
FORESTS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
TLS; single scan; multiple scans; biophysical parameters; TREE HEIGHT; ATTRIBUTES; TLS;
D O I
10.3390/f11040392
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Research Highlights: The present study case investigates the differences occurring when tree's biophysical parameters are extracted through single and multiple scans. Scan sessions covered mountainous and hill regions of the Carpathian forests. Background and Objectives: We focused on analyzing stems, as a function of diameter at breast height (DBH) and the total height (H), at sample plot level for natural forests, with the purpose of assessing the potential for transitioning available methodology to field work in Romania. Materials and Methods: We performed single and multiple scans using a FARO Focus 3D X130 phase shift terrestrial laser scanner at 122 kpts and 0.3:0.15 mm noise compression ratio, resulting in an average point density of 6pts at 10m. The point cloud we obtained underpinned the DBH and heights analysis. In order to reach values similar to those measured in the field, we used both the original and the segmented point clouds, postprocessed in subsamples of different radii. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient above 0.8 for diameters showed high correlation with the field measurements. Diameter averages displayed differences within tolerances (0.02 m) for 10 out of 12 plots. Height analysis led to poorer results. For both acquisition methods, the values of the correlation coefficient peaked at 0.6. The initial hypothesis that trees positioned at a distance equivalent to their height can be measured more precise, was not valid; no increase in correlation strength was visible for either heights or diameters as the distance from scanner varied (r = 0.52). Conclusions: With regard to tree biophysical parameters extraction, the acquisition method has no major influence upon visible trees. We emphasize the term "visible", as an increase in the number of acquisitions led to an increased number of detected trees (16% in old stands and 29% in young stands).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE STABILITY OF A PERMANENT TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING SYSTEM - A CASE STUDY WITH HOURLY SCANS
    Voordendag, A. B.
    Goger, B.
    Klug, C.
    Prinz, R.
    Rutzinger, M.
    Kaser, G.
    XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION II, 2022, 43-B2 : 1093 - 1099
  • [42] Assessing different components of three-dimensional forest structure with single-scan terrestrial laser scanning: A case study
    Seidel, Dominik
    Ehbrecht, Martin
    Puettmann, Klaus
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 381 : 196 - 208
  • [43] Retrieving Forest Inventory Variables with Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in Urban Heterogeneous Forest
    Moskal, L. Monika
    Zheng, Guang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [44] Erratum to: Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement
    Glenn J. Newnham
    John D. Armston
    Kim Calders
    Mathias I. Disney
    Jenny L. Lovell
    Crystal B. Schaaf
    Alan H. Strahler
    F. Mark Danson
    Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 214 - 214
  • [45] Structural assessment using terrestrial laser scanning point clouds
    Truong-Hong, Linh
    Lindenbergh, Roderik
    Nguyen, Thu Anh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND ADAPTATION, 2022, 40 (03) : 345 - 379
  • [46] Implications of Pulse Frequency in Terrestrial Laser Scanning on Forest Point Cloud Quality and Individual Tree Structural Metrics
    Verhelst, Tom E.
    Calders, Kim
    Burt, Andrew
    Demol, Miro
    D'hont, Barbara
    Nightingale, Joanne
    Terryn, Louise
    Verbeeck, Hans
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [47] BENCHMARKING INSTANCE SEGMENTATION IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOREST POINT CLOUDS
    Cherlet, Wout
    Cooper, Zane
    Van den Broeck, Wouter A. J.
    Disney, Mathias
    Origo, Niall
    Calders, Kim
    IGARSS 2024-2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, IGARSS 2024, 2024, : 4511 - 4515
  • [48] Comparison and Combination of Mobile and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Natural Forest Inventories
    Bienert, Anne
    Georgi, Louis
    Kunz, Matthias
    Maas, Hans-Gerd
    von Oheimb, Goddert
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (07)
  • [49] Quantifying Forest Litter Fuel Moisture Content with Terrestrial Laser Scanning
    Batchelor, Jonathan L.
    Rowell, Eric
    Prichard, Susan
    Nemens, Deborah
    Cronan, James
    Kennedy, Maureen C.
    Moskal, L. Monika
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [50] Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning
    Terryn, Louise
    Calders, Kim
    Disney, Mathias
    Origo, Niall
    Malhi, Yadvinder
    Newnham, Glenn
    Raumonen, Pasi
    Akerblom, Markku
    Verbeeck, Hans
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 168 : 170 - 181