The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke

被引:16
|
作者
Hu, Hsiang-Yueh [1 ]
Chi, Wen-Chou [2 ]
Chang, Kwang-Hwa [3 ,4 ]
Yen, Chia-Feng [5 ]
Escorpizo, Reuben [6 ,7 ]
Liao, Hua-Fang [8 ,9 ]
Huang, Shih-Wei [1 ,10 ,11 ]
Liou, Tsan-Hon [1 ,3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Shuang Ho Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Coll Med Sci & Technol, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Grad Inst Injury Prevent & Control, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Wan Fang Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Tzu Chi Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Hualien, Taiwan
[6] Univ Vermont, Dept Rehabil & Movement Sci, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Swiss Parapleg Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
[8] Taiwan Soc ICF, Taipei, Taiwan
[9] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[10] Taipei Med Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Sch Med, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[11] Natl Taiwan Sports Univ, Grad Inst Sports Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Disability evaluation; Institutionalization; Long-term care; International Classification of Functioning; Disability and Health; DISCHARGE DESTINATION; REHABILITATION CARE; HEMORRHAGIC STROKE; REGIONAL BURDEN; RISK-FACTORS; POPULATION; VERSION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04615-9
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a well-known questionnaire used to evaluate disability. We can not only evaluate disability but also obtain additional information by using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores. AIM: To predict the institutionalization of the patients with stroke by using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: The data of 10,255 patients with stroke were acquired from the Data Bank of Persons with Disabilities (TDPD) in Taiwan. POPULATION : Patients with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during chronic stage. METHODS: For the patients with stroke, we used a chi(2) analysis for the categorical variables, and an independent Student's t test to compare the standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores in the six domains between different groups. We also generated a receiver operating characteristic curve using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores, and applied Youden Index to calculating the optimal cut-off point on the ROC curve. Then, we used a binary logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors for the institutionalization. RESULTS : All WHODAS 2.0 domains had higher scores in the institution group than in the community group. The ROC curve used to predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke revealed that all WHODAS 2.0 domains were statistically significant. The cognition, and mobility domains and the sum of WHODAS 2.0 scores were more accurate for predicting the risk of institutionalization in a long-term care facility. In a logistic regression analysis, standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores >69, residence in an urban area, and severity of impairment were factors for predicting the institutionalization of the patients with stroke. CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS 2.0 scores, urbanization level, and severity of impairment were positive factors for the institutionalization of patients with stroke in long-term care facilities, whereas the female sex and an age of >= 85 years were negative factors. The cognition and mobility domains and standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores were more accurate for predicting the institutionalization of patients with stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 862
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (WHODAS 2.0) AND THE WHO MINIMAL GENERIC SET OF DOMAINS OF FUNCTIONING AND HEALTH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTS IN SUBACUTE STROKE
    Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka
    Hurme, Saija
    Laimi, Katri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (09) : 675 - 682
  • [42] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Marianna Papadopoulou
    Sophia Stasi
    Daphne Bakalidou
    Effie Papageorgiou
    Aristi Tsokani
    Theodora Bratsi
    George Papathanasiou
    [J]. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2020, 32 : 801 - 819
  • [43] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Aki Fujiwara
    Mitsuru Ida
    Katsuhiro Kimoto
    Keisuke Watanabe
    Masahiko Kawaguchi
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 81 - 85
  • [44] Construct Validity and Clinical Utility of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Older Patients Discharged From Emergency Departments
    Nielsen, Louise Moeldrup
    Oestergaard, Lisa Gregersen
    Kirkegaard, Hans
    Maribo, Thomas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2021, 2
  • [45] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [46] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Fujiwara, Aki
    Ida, Mitsuru
    Kimoto, Katsuhiro
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [47] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [48] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [49] Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule
    Schiavolin, Silvia
    Ferroli, Paolo
    Acerbi, Francesco
    Brock, Stefano
    Broggi, Morgan
    Cusin, Alberto
    Schiariti, Marco
    Visintini, Sergio
    Quintas, Rui
    Leonardi, Matilde
    Raggi, Alberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (03) : 267 - 270
  • [50] Validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II to assess disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients
    Meesters, Jorit J. L.
    Verhoef, John
    Liem, Inge S. L.
    Putter, Hein
    Vlieland, Thea P. M. Vliet
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (02) : 326 - 333