Assessing involvement with food: A systematic review of measures and tools

被引:10
|
作者
Castellini, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Graffigna, Guendalina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fac Agr Food & Environm Sci, Via Bissolati 74, I-26100 Cremona, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Consumer Food & Hlth Engagement Res Ctr, EngageMinds HUB, Milan, Italy
关键词
Food involvement; Measures; Systematic review; Consumer engagement; Food psychology; Consumer psychology; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT; BRAND ENGAGEMENT; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; CONSUMPTION; INFORMATION; ANTECEDENTS; MOTIVATION; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104444
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The construct of involvement has been shown to affect brand loyalty, diffusion of innovations, responses to advertising, and finally, food purchase choices. Despite the recognized importance of this construct in the food market, there is no agreement about the best way to define and measure it. This systematic review provides an overview of currently available involvement in food measures in order to understand the psychological domains covered and to assess their psychometric properties. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases were conducted in October 2020. Studies were considered that aimed at developing a measure of involvement in food (FI) or that assessed at least one measurement property of involvement in food measures. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The titles and abstracts of 4160 articles were screened, with 258 full-text articles assessed for eligi-bility. Of these, 36 studies were identified as meeting the study criteria, 19 of which were measure development studies. A range of FI entries was captured by included measures. These were classified into five psychological domains: affective, self-expressive, situational, cognitive and behavioral. Regarding the psychometric quality of measures, the results highlight that the scientific quality of most instruments is doubtful or inadequate. Future research should focus on reaching a shared definition of FI, oriented by a solid psychological analysis of the phenomenon, in order to develop a comprehensive scale able to generate rigorous, comparable and readable results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methodologies for assessing the household food availability in the context of food (in)security: a systematic review
    Schott, Eloise
    Canaan Rezende, Fabiane Aparecida
    Priore, Silvia Eloiza
    Ribeiro, Andreia Queiroz
    Castro Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2020, 25 (07): : 2677 - 2685
  • [22] Definition of professionalism and tools for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice: a systematic review
    Dubbai, Huda
    Adelstein, Barbara-Ann
    Taylor, Silas
    Shulruf, Boaz
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2019, 16
  • [23] Screening tools assessing mental illness in primary care: A systematic review
    Neulinger, Bernadette
    Ebert, Christopher
    Lochbuehler, Kirsten
    Bergmann, Antje
    Gensichen, Jochen
    Lukaschek, Karoline
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [24] Tools for Assessing Knowledge of Back Health in Adolescents: A Systematic Review Protocol
    Ramos, Adriana Cristina Fiaschi
    Silva, Regina Marcia Ferreira
    Bizinotto, Thailyne
    de Rezende, Leonardo Mateus Teixeira
    Minana-Signes, Vicente
    Monfort-Panego, Manuel
    Noll, Priscilla Rayanne e Silva
    Noll, Matias
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [25] Assessing Scientific Inquiry: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Tools and Techniques
    Vo, De Van
    Simmie, Geraldine Mooney
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2025, 23 (04) : 871 - 906
  • [26] 2806 Assessing medication self-Management in Older People at hospital-to-home transition: a systematic review of measures and tools
    Mohamed, H.
    Tomlinson, J.
    Ali, E.
    Badawoud, A.
    Silcock, J.
    Jameson, A.
    Sutherland, A.
    Smith, H.
    Fylan, B.
    Gardner, P. H.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2025, 54 : I32 - I32
  • [27] Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools
    Fransen, Annemarie F.
    de Boer, Liza
    Kienhorst, Dieneke
    Truijens, Sophie E.
    Heimel, Pieter J. van Runnard
    Oei, S. Guid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 216 : 184 - 191
  • [28] Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review
    K. J. Mrklas
    J. M. Boyd
    S. Shergill
    S. Merali
    M. Khan
    L. Nowell
    A. Goertzen
    L. M. Pfadenhauer
    K. Paul
    K. M. Sibley
    L. Swain
    M. Vis-Dunbar
    M. D. Hill
    S. Raffin-Bouchal
    M. Tonelli
    I. D. Graham
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 21
  • [29] Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review
    Mrklas, K. J.
    Boyd, J. M.
    Shergill, S.
    Merali, S.
    Khan, M.
    Nowell, L.
    Goertzen, A.
    Pfadenhauer, L. M.
    Paul, K.
    Sibley, K. M.
    Swain, L.
    Vis-Dunbar, M.
    Hill, M. D.
    Raffin-Bouchal, S.
    Tonelli, M.
    Graham, I. D.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [30] Studies assessing food consumption by the scores method: a systematic review
    Ferreira, Raphaela Costa
    Barbosa, Lidia Bezerra
    Lima Vasconcelos, Sandra Mary
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (05): : 1776 - 1791