Assessing involvement with food: A systematic review of measures and tools

被引:10
|
作者
Castellini, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Graffigna, Guendalina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fac Agr Food & Environm Sci, Via Bissolati 74, I-26100 Cremona, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Consumer Food & Hlth Engagement Res Ctr, EngageMinds HUB, Milan, Italy
关键词
Food involvement; Measures; Systematic review; Consumer engagement; Food psychology; Consumer psychology; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT; BRAND ENGAGEMENT; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; CONSUMPTION; INFORMATION; ANTECEDENTS; MOTIVATION; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104444
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The construct of involvement has been shown to affect brand loyalty, diffusion of innovations, responses to advertising, and finally, food purchase choices. Despite the recognized importance of this construct in the food market, there is no agreement about the best way to define and measure it. This systematic review provides an overview of currently available involvement in food measures in order to understand the psychological domains covered and to assess their psychometric properties. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases were conducted in October 2020. Studies were considered that aimed at developing a measure of involvement in food (FI) or that assessed at least one measurement property of involvement in food measures. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The titles and abstracts of 4160 articles were screened, with 258 full-text articles assessed for eligi-bility. Of these, 36 studies were identified as meeting the study criteria, 19 of which were measure development studies. A range of FI entries was captured by included measures. These were classified into five psychological domains: affective, self-expressive, situational, cognitive and behavioral. Regarding the psychometric quality of measures, the results highlight that the scientific quality of most instruments is doubtful or inadequate. Future research should focus on reaching a shared definition of FI, oriented by a solid psychological analysis of the phenomenon, in order to develop a comprehensive scale able to generate rigorous, comparable and readable results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools
    Dahl, Alicia Anne
    Fandetti, Stacy M.
    Ademu, Lilian O.
    Harris, Ryan
    Racine, Elizabeth F.
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [2] Assessing food and nutrition literacy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of existing tools
    Carroll, Nicholas
    Perreault, Maude
    Ma, David W. L.
    Haines, Jess
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (04) : 850 - 865
  • [3] MEASURES OF THE FOOD ENVIRONMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Sokol, Rebeccah
    Lytle, Leslie
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S107 - S107
  • [4] Assessing physical access to healthy food across United Kingdom: A systematic review of measures and findings
    Titis, Elzbieta
    Procter, Rob
    Walasek, Lukasz
    OBESITY SCIENCE & PRACTICE, 2022, 8 (02): : 233 - 246
  • [5] A systematic review of parent report measures assessing the psychosocial impact of food allergy on patients and families
    Proctor, Kaitlin B.
    Tison, Katherine
    H. Estrem, Hayley
    Park, Jinhee
    Scahill, Lawrence
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Sharp, William G.
    ALLERGY, 2022, 77 (05) : 1347 - 1359
  • [6] Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review
    Ali Ben Charif
    Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
    Amédé Gogovor
    Mamane Abdoulaye Samri
    José Massougbodji
    Luke Wolfenden
    Jenny Ploeg
    Merrick Zwarenstein
    Andrew J. Milat
    Nathalie Rheault
    Youssoufa M. Ousseine
    Jennifer Salerno
    Maureen Markle-Reid
    France Légaré
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 20
  • [7] Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review
    Ben Charif, Ali
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Gogovor, Amede
    Samri, Mamane Abdoulaye
    Massougbodji, Jose
    Wolfenden, Luke
    Ploeg, Jenny
    Zwarenstein, Merrick
    Milat, Andrew J.
    Rheault, Nathalie
    Ousseine, Youssoufa M.
    Salerno, Jennifer
    Markle-Reid, Maureen
    Legare, France
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [8] Assessing dissociation: A systematic review and evaluation of existing measures
    Wainipitapong, Sorawit
    Millman, L. S. Merritt
    Huang, Xi
    Wieder, Lillian
    Terhune, Devin B.
    Pick, Susannah
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2025, 181 : 91 - 98
  • [9] Measures Assessing the Quality of Case Conceptualization: A Systematic Review
    Bucci, Sandra
    French, Lorna
    Berry, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 72 (06) : 517 - 533
  • [10] Assessing sexual health literacy: a systematic review of measures
    Chenneville, Tiffany
    Haskett, Morgan
    Ligman, Kaitlyn
    Gardy, Sarah M.
    Crampsie, Camielle
    Hart, Trevor A.
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2025, 22 (02)