Assessing involvement with food: A systematic review of measures and tools

被引:9
|
作者
Castellini, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Graffigna, Guendalina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fac Agr Food & Environm Sci, Via Bissolati 74, I-26100 Cremona, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Consumer Food & Hlth Engagement Res Ctr, EngageMinds HUB, Milan, Italy
关键词
Food involvement; Measures; Systematic review; Consumer engagement; Food psychology; Consumer psychology; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT; BRAND ENGAGEMENT; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; CONSUMPTION; INFORMATION; ANTECEDENTS; MOTIVATION; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104444
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The construct of involvement has been shown to affect brand loyalty, diffusion of innovations, responses to advertising, and finally, food purchase choices. Despite the recognized importance of this construct in the food market, there is no agreement about the best way to define and measure it. This systematic review provides an overview of currently available involvement in food measures in order to understand the psychological domains covered and to assess their psychometric properties. Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases were conducted in October 2020. Studies were considered that aimed at developing a measure of involvement in food (FI) or that assessed at least one measurement property of involvement in food measures. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The titles and abstracts of 4160 articles were screened, with 258 full-text articles assessed for eligi-bility. Of these, 36 studies were identified as meeting the study criteria, 19 of which were measure development studies. A range of FI entries was captured by included measures. These were classified into five psychological domains: affective, self-expressive, situational, cognitive and behavioral. Regarding the psychometric quality of measures, the results highlight that the scientific quality of most instruments is doubtful or inadequate. Future research should focus on reaching a shared definition of FI, oriented by a solid psychological analysis of the phenomenon, in order to develop a comprehensive scale able to generate rigorous, comparable and readable results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools
    Dahl, Alicia Anne
    Fandetti, Stacy M.
    Ademu, Lilian O.
    Harris, Ryan
    Racine, Elizabeth F.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [2] Assessing food and nutrition literacy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of existing tools
    Carroll, Nicholas
    Perreault, Maude
    Ma, David W. L.
    Haines, Jess
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (04) : 850 - 865
  • [3] MEASURES OF THE FOOD ENVIRONMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Sokol, Rebeccah
    Lytle, Leslie
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S107 - S107
  • [4] Assessing physical access to healthy food across United Kingdom: A systematic review of measures and findings
    Titis, Elzbieta
    Procter, Rob
    Walasek, Lukasz
    [J]. OBESITY SCIENCE & PRACTICE, 2022, 8 (02): : 233 - 246
  • [5] A systematic review of parent report measures assessing the psychosocial impact of food allergy on patients and families
    Proctor, Kaitlin B.
    Tison, Katherine
    H. Estrem, Hayley
    Park, Jinhee
    Scahill, Lawrence
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Sharp, William G.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2022, 77 (05) : 1347 - 1359
  • [6] Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review
    Ali Ben Charif
    Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
    Amédé Gogovor
    Mamane Abdoulaye Samri
    José Massougbodji
    Luke Wolfenden
    Jenny Ploeg
    Merrick Zwarenstein
    Andrew J. Milat
    Nathalie Rheault
    Youssoufa M. Ousseine
    Jennifer Salerno
    Maureen Markle-Reid
    France Légaré
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20
  • [7] Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review
    Ben Charif, Ali
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Gogovor, Amede
    Samri, Mamane Abdoulaye
    Massougbodji, Jose
    Wolfenden, Luke
    Ploeg, Jenny
    Zwarenstein, Merrick
    Milat, Andrew J.
    Rheault, Nathalie
    Ousseine, Youssoufa M.
    Salerno, Jennifer
    Markle-Reid, Maureen
    Legare, France
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [8] Measures Assessing the Quality of Case Conceptualization: A Systematic Review
    Bucci, Sandra
    French, Lorna
    Berry, Katherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 72 (06) : 517 - 533
  • [9] Tools for Assessing Potential Significance of Pharmacist Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Vo, Thi-Ha
    Charpiat, Bruno
    Catoire, Claire
    Juste, Michel
    Roubille, Renaud
    Rose, Francois-Xavier
    Chanoine, Sebastien
    Bosson, Jean-Luc
    Conort, Ornella
    Allenet, Benoit
    Bedouch, Pierrick
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 39 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [10] eHealth tools for assessing psychomotor activity in schizophrenia: a systematic review
    Molina, Rosa
    Porras-Segovia, Alejandro
    Ruiz, Marta
    Baca-Garcia, Enrique
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 43 (01) : 102 - 107