Utilizing QFD for translating business objectives into action plans

被引:0
|
作者
Dror, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ort Braude Coll, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Karmiel, Israel
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS (ICIL 2008): LOGISTICS IN A FLAT WORLD: STRATEGY, MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS | 2008年
关键词
strategy deployment; quality function deployment (QFD); analysis of variance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Selection of appropriate business action plans is an essential, but complex task as it requires an understanding of their implications for the strategic objectives in a given industrial situation. This work utilized the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method as an instrument for ranking action plans of an individual organization in terms of its business objectives. Two methodological stages are suggested. In the first stage, a House of Strategy (HOS) matrix translates the improvement needs of a company's objectives into a list of competitive priority measures ranked according to their relative importance. A Mean Square Error (MSE) criterion supporting the selection of vital competitive priorities to be improved is employed. In the second stage, each vital competitive priority is broken down into its relevant processes and an operation matrix is constructed to translate the desired improvement in the processes into a list of action plans ranked by importance. Again, the MSE criterion supporting the selection of vital action plans is used. An illustrative example has shown that when a firm's vital competitive priority is 'stable product quality, an operation matrix extracts relevant processes and translates the desired improvement in failure costs, by processes, into the relative importance of the quality system action plans.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The formalisation of manufacturing strategy and its influence on the relationship between competitive objectives, improvement goals, and action plans
    Acur, N
    Gertsen, F
    Sun, HY
    Frick, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2003, 23 (10) : 1114 - 1141
  • [42] TRANSLATING PLANNING INTO ACTION
    CORFIELD, K
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1984, 17 (05) : 23 - 24
  • [43] Utilizing QFD in creation of a new industrial service concept
    Shunina, Tatiana
    Ojanen, Ville
    Kaessi, Tuomo
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2012, : 1764 - 1768
  • [44] Translating Tourist Requirements into Mobile AR Application Engineering Through QFD
    Han, Dai-In Danny
    Jung, Timothy
    Dieck, M. Claudia Tom
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2019, 35 (19) : 1842 - 1858
  • [45] Translating science into business.
    Schuster S.
    Nature, 2007, 446 (7135) : 582 - 582
  • [46] BUSINESS SCHOOL MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES
    ANTHONY, WP
    REVIEW OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 1981, 16 (03): : 38 - 47
  • [47] INVESTORS, MANAGERS, AND BUSINESS OBJECTIVES
    ASH, ME
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1970, 2 (01): : 11 - 16
  • [48] ACTION PLANS
    Hofacker, Cat
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2020, 58 (05) : 24 - 31
  • [49] Action Plans
    Plotnick, Mike
    ARCHITECT, 2014, 103 (01): : 46 - 48
  • [50] Plans for action
    Goodale, MA
    Milner, AD
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2004, 27 (01) : 37 - +