Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas

被引:29
|
作者
Chikarmane, Sona A. [1 ,2 ]
Michaels, Aya Y. [1 ]
Giess, Catherine S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Imaging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
breast; clustered ring enhancement; MRI; nonmass enhancement; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; T2-WEIGHTED IMAGES; LESIONS; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MALIGNANCY; RISK;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of reclassification of nonmass enhancement (NME) as background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and to determine positive predictive values (PPVs) of NME descriptors using the revised BI-RADS atlas. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of our institution's MRI database from January 1, 2009, through March 30, 2012, identified 6220 contrast-enhanced breast MRI examinations. All findings prospectively assessed as NME and rated as BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5 (n = 386) were rereviewed in consensus by two radiologists who were blinded to pathologic findings with the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Findings considered as postsurgical, associated with known cancers, NME given a BI-RADS category 3 assessment before 2009, previously biopsied, and those reclassified as BPE, focus, or mass were excluded (n = 181). Medical records were reviewed for demographics and outcomes. RESULTS. Two hundred five women were included (mean age, 48.8 years; range, 21-84 years). Seventy-seven of 386 findings (20.0%) were reclassified as BPE, and patients with BPE were younger than those with NME (mean age, 43.9 years; range, 31-62 years) (p = 0.003). Pathology results for 144 of 205 (70.2%) patients included 52 malignant, 11 high-risk, and 81 benign lesions. The highest PPVs for distribution patterns were 34.5% (10/29) for segmental and 100.0% (3/3) for diffuse distribution. The highest PPVs for internal enhancement patterns were 36.7% (11/30) for clustered ring enhancement and 27.5% (11/40) for clumped enhancement. No difference for NME malignancy rate was noted according to BPE (10/52 [19.2%] marked or moderate; 42/153 [27.5%] mild or minimal, p = 0.24). Thirty-two percent (17/52) of malignant NMEs had high T2 signal. CONCLUSION. Careful assessment of findings as BPE versus NME can improve PPVs, particularly in younger women. Although clustered ring enhancement had one of the study's highest PPVs, this number falls below previously published rates. Reliance on T2 signal as a benign feature may be misleading, because one-third of malignancies had T2 signal.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1184
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast MRI in the evaluation of locally recurrent or new breast cancer in the postoperative patient: Correlation of morphology and enhancement features with the BI-RADS category
    Seely, J. M.
    Nguyen, E. T.
    Jaffey, J.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (08) : 838 - 845
  • [42] Low Compliance in a Health-Conscience Spending Era Likely Helps Obviates the Need for 6 month BI-RADS 3 Breast MRI Follow-up After 1 year
    Mosier, Andrew
    Gupta, Esha
    Ataya, Dana
    Bhatt, Kavita
    Rim, Alice
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (05): : 504 - 508
  • [43] Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    Poole, Patricia S.
    Sippo, Dorothy A.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 707 - 715
  • [44] A comparison between short-interval and regular-interval follow-up for BI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Ruamsup, S.
    Wiratkapun, C.
    Wibulpolprasert, B.
    Lertsithichai, P.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [45] Results of Short-Term Follow-Up in BI-RADS 3 and 4a Breast Lesions with a Histological Diagnosis of Fibroadenoma at Percutaneous Needle Biopsy
    Clauser, Paola
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    Marcon, Magda
    Londero, Viviana
    Zuiani, Chiara
    BREAST CARE, 2017, 12 (04) : 238 - 242
  • [46] Patient, Examination, and System Factors Associated with Completed Follow-up for Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Breast Findings in a Large, Complex Health Care System
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Lynch, Elyse
    Lacson, Ronilda
    DiPiro, Pamela J.
    Salah, Fatima
    Chung, Stephanie H.
    Wang, Gary X.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 32 (02) : 681 - 690
  • [47] Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Berg, Jeremy M.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Rosenberg, Robert D.
    Lee, Cindy S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [48] Vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy for isolated BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications: evaluation with histopathology and midterm follow-up results
    Atasoy, Mehmet Mahir
    Tasali, Nuri
    Cubuk, Rahmi
    Narin, Burcu
    Deveci, Ugur
    Yener, Nese
    Celik, Levent
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [49] Image-guided Procedure Versus 2-year Follow-up for a BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Lesion: A Cost Comparison Analysis
    Ong, Andrew
    Azizi, Armina
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    Oluyemi, Eniola T.
    Harvey, Susan C.
    Hung, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [50] Radiomics model to classify mammary masses using breast DCE-MRI compared to the BI-RADS classification performance
    Kawtar Debbi
    Paul Habert
    Anaïs Grob
    Anderson Loundou
    Pascale Siles
    Axel Bartoli
    Alexis Jacquier
    Insights into Imaging, 14