Effect of different homogenisation methods and UHT processing on the stability of pea protein emulsion

被引:51
|
作者
Qamar, Sadia [1 ]
Bhandari, Bhesh [1 ]
Prakash, Sangeeta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Pea protein concentrate (PPC); UHT treatment; Microfluidisation; Ultrasonicated; Hydrophobicity; IN-WATER EMULSIONS; FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES; EMULSIFYING PROPERTIES; PISUM-SATIVUM; ISOELECTRIC PRECIPITATION; PARTICLE-SIZE; LENTIL; COALESCENCE; CHICKPEA; ISOLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.028
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Pea protein is a very popular source of edible plant-based protein among legumes. In this study, the stability of ultra high temperature (UHT) processed pea protein emulsion prepared from 0.5 and 1.0% (w/v) pea protein concentrate (PPC) by two different homogenisation methods of microfluidisation (500 Bar) and ultrasonication (ultrasonicated for 1, 3 and 5 min) was investigated. In addition, the emulsion properties (particle and droplet size, flocculation, coalescence, zeta potential, hydrophobicity and creaming index) of PPC emulsions before and after UHT treatment were measured. The overall heat transfer coefficient (OHTC) versus time graphs were stable during UHT processing for both microfluidised and ultrasonicated PPC emulsions that indicates no fouling and good stability under the thermal treatment condition. Freshly prepared emulsion using 0.5 and 1.0% PPC and ultrasonicated for 5 min showed creaming index of 5.73 and 8.39%, particle size of 0.96 and 1.53 mu m respectively. In addition, the fat droplet size for the above samples measured 1.05 and 1.85 mu m for larger fat droplets and 0.51 and 0.72 mu m for smaller fat droplets, respectively. However, after UHT treatment this emulsion de-stabilised due to protein aggregation as indicated by the high flocculation index (13.22 and 103.35%), particle size (1.59 and 3.23 mu m) and droplet size (1.30 and 2.53 mu m, for large fat droplets and 0.90 and 1.22 mu m, for small fat droplets). After UHT treatment the microfluidised PPC emulsion using 0.5 and 1.0% PPC were the most stable with small particle size (2.85 and 0.36 mu m), high zeta potential (-56.36 and - 27.30) and low creaming index (3.87% and 4.97%), respectively as compared to ultrasonicated samples. Overall, this study revealed that UHT treatment improved emulsion properties of the microfluidised PPC emulsion compared to the ultrasonicated PPC emulsion.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1385
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Different Processing on Corn Starch and Protein
    Zou, Jian
    Gao, Haiyan
    Zeng, Jie
    ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY RESEARCH II, PTS 1-3, 2012, 554-556 : 990 - +
  • [32] Thermal stability, antioxidant activity and bioavailability of pea protein-naringin Pickering emulsion for enhanced delivery applications
    Huang, Meigui
    Tian, Mengwei
    Tan, Chen
    Ying, Ruifeng
    Ahmad, Mehraj
    Hao, Gang
    Liao, Qiuhong
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 188
  • [33] Study on the mechanism of polyphenols regulating the stability of pea isolate protein formed Pickering emulsion based on interfacial effects
    Ma, Lulu
    Yang, Xiaofan
    Huo, Jiaying
    Li, Shugang
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2025, 463
  • [34] Effect of Heat Treatment and Protein Concentration on the Stability and Rheological Properties of Myofibrillar Protein Emulsion
    Hao M.
    Mao S.
    Zhou Z.
    Wang L.
    Xiong G.
    Shi L.
    Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43 (23) : 56 - 63
  • [35] Coacervation in pea protein solutions: The effect of pH, salt, and fractionation processing steps
    Kornet, Remco
    Roozalipour, Sarah Lamochi
    Venema, Paul
    van der Goot, Atze Jan
    Meinders, Marcel B. J.
    van der Linden, Erik
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2022, 125
  • [36] Gelation of commercial pea protein isolate: effect of microbial transglutaminase and thermal processing
    Maria Moreno, Helena
    Asuncion Tovar, Clara
    Dominguez-Timon, Fatima
    Cano-Baez, Jorge
    Teresa Diaz, Maria
    Martin Pedrosa, Mercedes
    Javier Borderias, Antonio
    FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 40 (04): : 800 - 809
  • [37] Effect of Different Processing Methods on the Quality of Alfalfa Hay
    Xu Wei
    Shi Shangli
    Qi Juan
    Squires, Victor R.
    Hua Limin
    Zhang Wenyu
    Wang Xingzhong
    Wang Yongfu
    Ni Xingze
    Liu Changbo
    Li Peng
    Chai Shaofang
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2013, 12 (06): : 689 - 693
  • [38] Effect of Different Processing Methods on the Nutritional Value of Rice
    Kalita, Tarali
    Gohain, Upasana P.
    Hazarika, Jimpi
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (02) : 683 - 691
  • [39] Functional attributes of pea protein isolates prepared using different extraction methods and cultivars
    Stone, Andrea K.
    Karalash, Anna
    Tyler, Robert T.
    Warkentin, Thomas D.
    Nickerson, Michael T.
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 76 : 31 - 38
  • [40] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT PRODUCTION METHODS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PEA CULTIVAR 'MADONNA'
    Tein, Berit
    Eremeev, Vyacheslav
    Keres, Indrek
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2011, VOL 1, 2011, : 24 - 28