Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions

被引:77
|
作者
Raymond, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Gregory [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ctr Rural Hlth & Community Dev, Stirling, SA 5152, Australia
[2] Enviroconnect Pty Ltd, Stirling, SA 5152, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Conservation opportunity; Conservation priority; Socio-demographic factors; Economic factors; Conservation behavior; Native vegetation conservation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FARMERS ADOPTION; BIOPHYSICAL DATA; PARTICIPATION; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; DECISION; SCHEMES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a method for assessing conservation opportunity on private land based on landholders' socio-economic, behavioral, and farm characteristics. These characteristics include age, gender, education, level of off-farm income, farm size, proportion of remnant native vegetation on-farm, and ecological value of native vegetation on-farm. A sample of landholders who own greater than 2 ha of land in the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin region were sent a mail-based survey about their values and preferences for environmental management (N = 659, 52% response). Cross-tabulations and ANOVA statistical analysis techniques were used to compare the socio-economic attributes across three landholder classes: disengaged, moderately engaged, and highly engaged in native vegetation planting. Results indicate that highly engaged landholders were more likely to be female, formally educated, hobby farmers who managed small parcels of land and have high off-farm incomes, whereas disengaged landholders held significantly stronger farming connections (more farming experience, family have lived on the farm for more generations). Spatial analysis revealed area-specific differences in conservation opportunity and conservation priority. In some areas, properties of high ecological value were managed by highly engaged landholders, but nearby properties of high value were managed by moderately engaged or disengaged landholders. Environmental managers therefore cannot assume areas of high conservation priority will be areas of high conservation opportunity. At the regional scale, the potential for revegetation seems most promising within the moderately engaged landholder group considering the vast amount of land managed by this group in areas of high ecological value, particularly within the less represented Mallee and Coorong and Rangelands sub-regions. We suggest that incentive schemes which purchase conservation need to be targeted at disengaged landholders: mentoring schemes led by commercial farmers highly engaged in native vegetation planting should be directed at moderately engaged landholders, and; awards programs which acknowledge conservation successes should be targeted at highly engaged landholders. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2513 / 2523
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Socio-economic values and tropical rain forest conservation
    Eaton, P
    TROPICAL RAINFOREST RESEARCH - CURRENT ISSUES, 1996, 74 : 417 - 423
  • [32] Opportunity and/or Necessity Entrepreneurship? The Impact of the Socio-Economic Characteristics of Entrepreneurs
    Giacomin, Olivier
    Janssen, Frank
    Guyot, Jean-Luc
    Lohest, Olivier
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [33] Mapping and assessing land degradation vulnerability in Kangra district using physical and socio-economic indicators
    Prakash S.
    Sharma M.C.
    Kumar R.
    Dhinwa P.S.
    Sastry K.L.N.
    Rajawat A.S.
    Spatial Information Research, 2016, 24 (6) : 733 - 744
  • [34] Legal and economic issues in private land conservation
    Meiners, RE
    Parker, DP
    NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2004, 44 (02) : 353 - 360
  • [35] SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LAND MANAGEMENT IN CITIES
    Petrakovska, Olga
    Mykhalova, Mariia
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-FORMATIO CIRCUMIECTUS, 2018, 17 (04) : 173 - 180
  • [36] SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MAN-LAND RELATIONSHIPS
    BIFFOT, L
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 1968, 8 (3-4) : 305 - 329
  • [37] Ecological and socio-economic consequences of land use changes
    Mander, Ü
    Jongman, RHG
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY: A GLANCE FROM THE VII INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ECOLOGY, 1999, : 269 - 280
  • [38] Socio-economic determinants of agricultural land trade in Poland
    Alina, Sikorska
    Vit, Skala
    AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XVIII, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 83 - 83
  • [39] IMPACTS OF LAND POLICY AND LAND LAW ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM
    Dang, Mai Hai
    Hung, Nguyen Vinh
    LEX HUMANA, 2023, 15 (01) : 521 - 536
  • [40] Assessing the Socio-Economic Sustainability of Sugarcane Harvesting in Thailand
    Wanchat Sawaengsak
    Jittima Prasara-A
    Shabbir H. Gheewala
    Sugar Tech, 2021, 23 : 263 - 277