Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions

被引:77
|
作者
Raymond, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Gregory [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ctr Rural Hlth & Community Dev, Stirling, SA 5152, Australia
[2] Enviroconnect Pty Ltd, Stirling, SA 5152, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Conservation opportunity; Conservation priority; Socio-demographic factors; Economic factors; Conservation behavior; Native vegetation conservation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FARMERS ADOPTION; BIOPHYSICAL DATA; PARTICIPATION; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; DECISION; SCHEMES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a method for assessing conservation opportunity on private land based on landholders' socio-economic, behavioral, and farm characteristics. These characteristics include age, gender, education, level of off-farm income, farm size, proportion of remnant native vegetation on-farm, and ecological value of native vegetation on-farm. A sample of landholders who own greater than 2 ha of land in the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin region were sent a mail-based survey about their values and preferences for environmental management (N = 659, 52% response). Cross-tabulations and ANOVA statistical analysis techniques were used to compare the socio-economic attributes across three landholder classes: disengaged, moderately engaged, and highly engaged in native vegetation planting. Results indicate that highly engaged landholders were more likely to be female, formally educated, hobby farmers who managed small parcels of land and have high off-farm incomes, whereas disengaged landholders held significantly stronger farming connections (more farming experience, family have lived on the farm for more generations). Spatial analysis revealed area-specific differences in conservation opportunity and conservation priority. In some areas, properties of high ecological value were managed by highly engaged landholders, but nearby properties of high value were managed by moderately engaged or disengaged landholders. Environmental managers therefore cannot assume areas of high conservation priority will be areas of high conservation opportunity. At the regional scale, the potential for revegetation seems most promising within the moderately engaged landholder group considering the vast amount of land managed by this group in areas of high ecological value, particularly within the less represented Mallee and Coorong and Rangelands sub-regions. We suggest that incentive schemes which purchase conservation need to be targeted at disengaged landholders: mentoring schemes led by commercial farmers highly engaged in native vegetation planting should be directed at moderately engaged landholders, and; awards programs which acknowledge conservation successes should be targeted at highly engaged landholders. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2513 / 2523
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping Human and Social Dimensions of Conservation Opportunity for the Scheduling of Conservation Action on Private Land
    Knight, Andrew T.
    Cowling, Richard M.
    Difford, Mark
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) : 1348 - 1358
  • [2] SPATIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF URBAN-RENEWAL - ZAMBIA
    GWEBU, TD
    EKISTICS-THE PROBLEMS AND SCIENCE OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS, 1982, 49 (292): : 61 - &
  • [3] Assessing the socio-economic dimensions of the rise of organic farming in the European Union
    Konstantinidis, Charalampos
    REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 2016, 74 (02) : 172 - 193
  • [4] Socio-economic and behavioral specificities of diabetics
    Mrozovski, Jean-Michel
    ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES, 2023, 62 (622): : 22 - 24
  • [5] Land Fragmentation and Socio-Economic Wellbeing
    Mohamed, Nurulanis Ahmad
    Chuweni, Nor Nazihah
    Blake, Andrea
    ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2023, 8 (23): : 185 - 191
  • [6] The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
    Shumba, Tafadzwa
    De Vos, Alta
    Biggs, Reinette
    Esler, Karen J.
    Clements, Hayley S.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 28
  • [7] The Socio-Economic Reasons for Land Desertification
    王贤
    周金星
    武健伟
    Journal of Beijing Forestry University(English Edition), 1998, (01) : 31 - 39
  • [8] Economic Tomography: Opportunity to Foresee and Respond to Socio-Economic Crises
    Kuklin, A. A.
    Bystray, G. P.
    Okhotnikov, S. A.
    Vasilyeva, E. V.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2015, 4 : 40 - 53
  • [9] Ageing in India: Socio-economic and health dimensions
    Chakraborti, Rajagopal Dhar
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDIAN SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 41 (03) : 452 - 453
  • [10] SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF PRIVATE ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION
    HADDEN, DW
    JOURNAL OF URBAN LAW, 1971, 48 (03): : 607 - 616